CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

O-073. The endometrial profile of women with recurrent implantation failure following embryo transfer in an IVF programme

Klentzeris, L.D., Moran, V., Turner, R., Montgomery, S., Griffiths, M., Kennedy, R.·1997·Human Reproduction
DOI 10.1093/humrep/12.suppl_2.34
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

L.D. Klentzeris, V. Moran, R. Turner, S. Montgomery, M. Griffiths, R. Kennedy; O-073. The endometrial profile of women with recurrent implantation failure

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/12.suppl_2.34

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are no undisputed markers in humans of uterine receptivity to a fertilized ovum other than implantation itself.

    “There are no undisputed markers in humans of uterine receptivity to a fertilized ovum other than implantation itself.23,24”

    From Time of Implantation of the Conceptus and Loss of Pregnancy (1999) · cites this paper as [24]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Klentzeris, L. D., Moran, V., Turner, R., Montgomery, S., Griffiths, M., & Kennedy, R.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1997-06
Volume
12
Issue
Suppl_2
Pages
34-34
ISSN
  • 1460-2350
  • 0268-1161
DOI
10.1093/humrep/12.suppl_2.34
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review