The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uterine leiomyomas reduce the efficacy of assisted reproduction cycles: results of a matched follow-up study
Abstract
A matched follow-up study design was used to test the hypothesis that pregnancy rates following assisted reproduction procedures do not differ between women with or without intramural or sub-serosal uterine leiomyomas. Women undergoing their first in-vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo transfer or zygote intra-Fallopian transfer (ZIFT) cycle between January 1993 and June 1995 were included. Cases (women with leiomyomas) were matched 1:1 with the next consecutive control (women without leiomyomas) according to age, number of embryos transferred, embryo grade, and the route of embryo transfer (uterine or Fallopian). Assisted reproduction cycles were performed in an identical manner, independent of the presence or absence of uterine leiomyomas. The main outcomes measured were clinical pregnancy and delivery rates. A total of 182 cycles was evaluated. Of the 91 assisted reproduction cycles performed in the leiomyoma group, there were 34 clinical pregnancies (37%) and 30 deliveries (33%). Of the 91 assisted reproduction cycles in the control group, there were 48 clinical pregnancies (53%) and 44 deliveries (48%). The Mantel-Haenszel estimate of relative risk indicated that the presence of a uterine leiomyoma significantly reduced the chance for a clinical pregnancy or delivery. These findings suggest that leiomyomas are associated with a reduction in the efficacy of assisted reproduction cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence
Pritts, E. A., Parker, W. H., & Olive, D. L. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.051 · Cited by 913
The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States
Cardozo, E. R., Clark, A. D., Banks, N. K., Henne, M. B., Stegmann, B. J., & Segars, J. H. (2012) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.002 · Cited by 657
Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery
Klatsky, P. C., Tran, N. D., Caughey, A. B., & Fujimoto, V. Y. (2008) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.039 · Cited by 579
Recurrent miscarriage: aetiology, management and prognosis
Li, T. C. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.5.463 · Cited by 435
Taylor, E., & Gomel, V. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.069 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Stovall, D. W., Parrish, S. B., Van Voorhis, B. J., Hahn, S. J., Sparks, A. E., & Syrop, C. H.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 192-197
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2104898895
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uterine leiomyomas reduce the efficacy of assisted reproduction cycles: results of a matched follow-up study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/13.1.192
- The paper
- Stovall, D. W., Parrish, S. B., Van Voorhis, B. J., Hahn, S. J., Sparks, A. E., & Syrop, C. H. (1998). Uterine leiomyomas reduce the efficacy of assisted reproduction cycles: results of a matched follow-up study. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.1.192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.