The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between common morphological anomalies of cleaving embryos and their ability to form apparently normal blastocysts in vitro. The impact of cleavage rate, fragmentation, and multinucleation on compaction, cavitation, along with inner cell mass and trophectoderm formation has been assessed. The study population consisted of 102 patients who elected or were selected to have a day 5 embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were 66.7 and 49% respectively. Slow and fast cleavage had a significant negative association with normal blastocyst formation. Only 13.8% (67/484) of embryos with <7 cells and 27.5% (25/91) of those with >9 cells on day 3 formed blastocysts with apparently normal morphology, compared to 41.9% (252/602) with 7-9 cells on day 3 (P < 0.001). Fragmentation had a negative impact on normal blastocyst formation. Embryos with >15% fragmentation formed normal blastocysts at a significantly lower rate (46/279; 16.5%) than embryos with 0-15% fragmentation (311/935; 33.3%) (P < 0. 001). Furthermore, the pattern of fragmentation was associated with blastocyst formation. Type IV fragmentation led to a significant reduction in blastocyst formation (25/170 or 14.7%), compared to types I, II and III which performed much better (38.6, 32.9 and 32.4% respectively). Only 15.9% (22/138) of embryos with one or more multinucleate cells on day 2 and/or 3 formed normal blastocysts compared with 31.9% (335/1051) (P < 0.001) of those without multinucleation. Collectively, the data suggest that cleavage anomalies, some of which do not preclude development after short-term culture, may reduce the developmental competence of embryos after prolonged culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation
Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsoe, K. M., Ramsing, N. B., & Remohi, J. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der256 · Cited by 913
Metcalfe, A. D., Hunter, H. R., Bloor, D. J., Lieberman, B. A., Picton, H. M., Leese, H. J., Kimber, S. J., & Brison, D. R. (2004) · Molecular Reproduction and Development · doi:10.1002/mrd.20055 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Alikani, M., Calderon, G., Tomkin, G., Garrisi, J., Kokot, M., & Cohen, J.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2634-2643
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2117485283
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/15.12.2634
- The paper
- Alikani, M., Calderon, G., Tomkin, G., Garrisi, J., Kokot, M., & Cohen, J. (2000). Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.12.2634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.