The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare, in infertile patients, the efficacy of laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy, in restoring fertility and to evaluate the obstetric outcomes. Between January 1993 and January 1998, 131 patients of reproductive age, with anamnesis of infertility, underwent myomectomy because of the presence of at least one large myoma (diameter greater than or = 5 cm). Patients were randomly selected for treatment by laparotomy (n = 65) or laparoscopy (n = 66). The two groups were homogeneous for number, size and position of large myomata. Significant differences were found in the post-operative outcome: febrile morbidity (> 38 degrees C) was more frequent in the abdominal than in the laparoscopic group (26.2 versus 12.1%; P < 0.05). Laparotomy caused a more pronounced haemoglobin drop (2.17 +/- 1.57 versus 1.33 +/- 1.23; P < 0.001); three patients received a blood transfusion after laparotomy and none after laparoscopy. The post-operative hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (142.80 +/- 34.60 versus 75.61 +/- 37.09 h; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found between the two groups as concerns pregnancy rate (55.9% after laparotomy, 53.6% after laparoscopy), abortion rate (12.1 versus 20%), preterm delivery (7.4 versus 5%) and the use of Caesarean section (77.8 versus 65%). No case of uterine rupture during pregnancy or labour was observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Taylor, E., & Gomel, V. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.069 · Cited by 384
Bosteels, J., Weyers, S., Puttemans, P., Panayotidis, C., Van Herendael, B., Gomel, V., Mol, B. W. J., Mathieu, C., & D'Hooghe, T. (2010) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp033 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Seracchioli, R., Rossi, S., Govoni, F., Rossi, E., Venturoli, S., Bulletti, C., & Flamigni, C.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2663-2668
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2065543453
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/15.12.2663
- The paper
- Seracchioli, R., Rossi, S., Govoni, F., Rossi, E., Venturoli, S., Bulletti, C., & Flamigni, C. (2000). Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.12.2663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.