The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective controlled study of the effect of intramural uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted conception
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although uterine fibroids occur in 30% of women and are associated with a degree of subfertility, the effect of intramural fibroids on the outcome of IVF or ICSI treatment has not been prospectively studied. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on 434 women undergoing IVF/ICSI in the assisted conception unit of an inner London teaching hospital. Patients were assessed for the presence of fibroids by transvaginal ultrasound and hysterosonography or hysteroscopy where appropriate. RESULTS: During the study period, 112 women with (study), and 322 women without (controls), intramural fibroids were treated. Patients were similar regarding the cause and duration of their infertility, number of previous treatments, and basal serum FSH concentration. Women in the study group were on average 2 years older (36.4 versus 34.6 years; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the duration of ovarian stimulation or gonadotrophin requirement, number of follicles developed, oocytes collected, embryos available for transfer or replaced. When analysing only women with intramural fibroids of < or =5 cm in size (n = 106) pregnancy, implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly reduced: 23.3, 11.9 and 15.1 respectively compared with 34.1, 20.2 and 28.3% in the control group (P = 0.016, P = 0.018 and P = 0.003). The mean size of the largest fibroids was 2.3 cm (90% range 2.1-2.5 cm). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the presence of intramural fibroids was one of the significant variables affecting the chance of an ongoing pregnancy, even after controlling for the number of embryos available for replacement and increasing age, particularly age > or =40 years, odds ratio 0.46 (CI 0.24-0.88; P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that an intramural fibroid halves the chances of an ongoing pregnancy following assisted conception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rai, R., & Regan, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69204-0 · Cited by 1,227
Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence
Pritts, E. A., Parker, W. H., & Olive, D. L. (2009) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.051 · Cited by 913
Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery
Klatsky, P. C., Tran, N. D., Caughey, A. B., & Fujimoto, V. Y. (2008) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.039 · Cited by 579
Recurrent miscarriage: aetiology, management and prognosis
Li, T. C. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.5.463 · Cited by 435
Taylor, E., & Gomel, V. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.069 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, R., Khalaf, Y., Yeong, C.-T., Seed, P., Taylor, A., & Braude, P.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2411-2417
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2167115210
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective controlled study of the effect of intramural uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted conception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/16.11.2411
- The paper
- Hart, R., Khalaf, Y., Yeong, C.-T., Seed, P., Taylor, A., & Braude, P. (2001). A prospective controlled study of the effect of intramural uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted conception. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.11.2411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.