Cited by 263Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Assessment of DNA integrity and morphology of ejaculated spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men before and after cryopreservation

Donnelly, E. T.·2001·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa is extensively used in artificial insemination and IVF programmes. Despite various advances in cryopreservation methodology, the recovery rate of functional post-thaw spermatozoa remains mediocre, with sperm motility being significantly decreased after freezing. This aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cryopreservation on both DNA integrity and morphology of spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men. Semen samples were obtained from 17 fertile and 40 infertile men. All samples were prepared by discontinuous Percoll density centrifugation (95.0:47.5). Samples were divided into aliquots to allow direct comparison of fresh and frozen spermatozoa from the same ejaculate. Aliquots for cryopreservation were mixed with a commercial cryoprotectant and frozen by static phase vapour cooling before plunging into liquid nitrogen. Thawing was carried out slowly at room temperature. Sperm DNA integrity was determined using a modified alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay and sperm morphology analysed using the Tygerberg criteria. DNA of semen and prepared spermatozoa from fertile men was found to be unaffected by cryopreservation. In marked contrast, spermatozoa from infertile men were significantly damaged by freeze-thawing. Cryopreservation had a detrimental effect on morphology of semen and prepared samples from fertile and infertile men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/16.6.1191

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnelly, E. T.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Donnelly, E. T.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
1191-1199
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2135622711
Cited by
263
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
sperm cryopreservation, sperm DNA integrity, sperm morphology, male infertility, frost damage, sperm motility, alkaline comet assay, cryoprotectants, post-thaw sperm quality
MeSH terms
DNA, DNA Damage, Ejaculation, Electrophoresis, Agar Gel, Hot Temperature, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Infertility, Male, Male, Semen, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Cryopreservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review