Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage
Abstract
Background Misoprostol is effective for cervical priming prior to suction evacuation in first trimester pregnancy termination. This is the first randomized study to compare vaginal misoprostol versus expectant treatment in women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage. Methods Sixty women presenting with spontaneous miscarriage were recruited to the study at the Queen Mary Hospital between 1998 and 1999. They were randomized to group 1: misoprostol; and group 2: expectant management. Women in the misoprostol group received vaginal misoprostol 400 microg on days 1, 3 and 5. The expectant group was followed up according to the same schedule. Suction evacuation was performed if there was excessive bleeding or abdominal pain; or if a gestational sac was detected by transvaginal scan on day 15. Results Fifty-nine women completed the trial. Those who did not require suction evacuation up to the time of return of normal menstruation were considered to be successful. The incidence of side-effects was comparable between the two groups. Three women in the expectant group and one in the misoprostol group underwent emergency suction evacuation because of excessive bleeding. The mean duration of vaginal bleeding was similar for both groups (14.6 days in the misoprostol group versus 15.0 days in the expectant group). The successful rate in the misoprostol group was significantly higher than that of the expectant group (83.3 versus 48.3%, P Conclusion We recommend repeated vaginal misoprost…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Randomised trials have shown that outpatient use of misoprostol is possible, with success rates of 72-93%.
“Randomised trials have shown that this is possible, with success rates of 72-93%.10,13-15,28-31”
From Management of miscarriage: expectant, medical, or surgical? Results of randomised controlled trial (miscarriage treatment (MIST) trial) (2006) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trinder, J., Brocklehurst, P., Porter, R., Read, M., Vyas, S., & Smith, L. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38828.593125.55 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
A cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical management of early pregnancy loss
Rausch, M., Lorch, S., Chung, K., Frederick, M., Zhang, J., & Barnhart, K. (2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.044 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
You, J. H. S., & Chung, T. K. H. (2005) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dei163 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ngai, S. W.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ngai, S. W.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1493-1496
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2159347147
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
- Keywords
- misoprostol, vaginal misoprostol, miscarriage, early pregnancy loss, expectant management, suction evacuation, cervical priming, miscarriage treatment
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Administration, Intravaginal, Adult, Emergency Treatment, Female, Humans, Oxytocics, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Uterine Hemorrhage, Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical, Misoprostol, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review