Cited by 8Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

The acrosome index, radical buffer capacity and number of isolated progressively motile spermatozoa predict IVF results

Rhemrev, Johann P.T., Menkveld, Roelof, Roseboom, Tessa J., van Overveld, Floris W.P.C., Teerlink, Tom, Lombard, Carl, Vermeiden, Jan P.W.·2001·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Background The accuracy by which a number of newly described semen variables can predict either total fertilization failure (TFF) or pregnancy outcome in IVF, has not previously been investigated. The study aim was, therefore, to determine prospectively the predictive value of these variables. Methods The semen variables investigated were the post-wash total progressively motile sperm cell count (TPMC(post-wash)), the acrosome index (AI), 'cytoplasmic residues' and normal sperm morphology, evaluated according to the strict criteria ('strict criteria'), as well as the fast and slow total radical trapping antioxidant potential ('fast TRAP' and 'slow TRAP' respectively). Results The study group (n = 87) showed a mean (+/- SD) number of 10.2 +/- SD retrieved oocytes, 12.6% TFF, a mean fertilization rate of 59.7% and a pregnancy rate of 19.5% (17/87). TFF was significantly predicted by TPMC(post-wash), 'strict criteria', AI and 'cytoplasmic residues' (all P Conclusions Of all the measured and calculated semen variables, TPMC(post-wash) was the best predictor of TFF, whilst AI and 'fast TRAP' were the best predictors of pregnancy after IVF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1885

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhemrev, J. P. T., Menkveld, R., Roseboom, T. J., van Overveld, F. W. P. C., Teerlink, T., Lombard, C., & Vermeiden, J. P. W.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Vermeiden, Jan P.W.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2001-09
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1885-1892
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2143777159
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
sperm motility, total fertilization failure, IVF outcome prediction, pregnancy rate, sperm morphology, semen quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Buffers, Female, Fertilization, Fertilization in Vitro, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Oocytes, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Specimen Handling, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Treatment Outcome, Treatment Failure, Pregnancy Rate, Acrosome Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review