The DOI matches its Crossref record.
One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The main reason for adverse treatment outcome in assisted reproduction is the high rate of multiple pregnancies. The only strategy to avoid dizygotic twins is to transfer one embryo at a time. METHODS: A total of 144 women, who had had at least four good quality embryos available after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and who had no more than one previous failed treatment cycle, were randomized to have either one or two embryos transferred. The treatment outcomes including those after frozen embryo transfer were compared between these groups. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 32.4% in the one embryo transfer group and 47.1% in the two embryo transfer group, the difference being not significant. Eleven twin deliveries (n = 39) occurred in the two embryo transfer group and there was one pair of monozygotic twins in the one embryo transfer group. The cumulative pregnancy rate per patient after transfer of fresh and frozen embryos was 47.3% in the one embryo transfer group and 58.6% in the two embryo transfer group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that among women who have good quality embryos in their first IVF/ICSI, good treatment results can be achieved. They support the idea of changing embryo transfer policy towards one embryo transfer without any remarkable decrease in the success rate, while dizygotic twins can be avoided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? a cohort study
Olivius, C., Friden, B., Borg, G., & Bergh, C. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029 · Cited by 377
Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births
Blondel, B., & Kaminski, M. (2002) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/sper.2002.34775 · Cited by 331
Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Grady, R., Alavi, N., Vale, R., Khandwala, M., & McDonald, S. D. (2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.033 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Martikainen, H., Tiitinen, A., Tomás, C., Tapanainen, J., Orava, M., Tuomivaara, L., Vilska, S., Hydén-Granskog, C., & Hovatta, O.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1900-1903
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2074967016
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/16.9.1900
- The paper
- Martikainen, H., Tiitinen, A., Tomás, C., Tapanainen, J., Orava, M., Tuomivaara, L., Vilska, S., Hydén-Granskog, C., & Hovatta, O. (2001). One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.9.1900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.