Cited by 204Intestinal and Peritoneal AdhesionsEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryHernia repair and management

A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficacy of 4% icodextrin solution in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery

di Zerega, G.S.·2002·Human Reproduction

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adhesion-related readmissions are frequent sequelae to gynaecological surgery. Attempts to prevent adhesions by separating healing peritoneal surfaces include site-specific barriers and hydroflotation by instilled solutions. Rapid absorption limits the effectiveness of solutions such as Ringer's lactated saline (RLS). This pilot study assessed the safety, tolerability and preliminary effectiveness of a non-viscous, iso-osmolar solution of 4% icodextrin, an alpha-1,4 glucose polymer with prolonged intraperitoneal residence, in reducing adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. METHODS: Women aged > or = 18 years, requiring laparoscopic adnexal surgery (n = 62), were entered into a randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, multicentre study to compare 4% icodextrin with RLS. Treatments were coded in blocks of four with equal randomization to each group, and pre-allocated to consecutively numbered patients. At least 100 ml per 30 min was used for intra-operative lavage, with 1 l instilled post-operatively. Per protocol analysis included all eligible patients (n = 53); reformation analysis required one or more baseline adhesion (n = 42). Incidence, extent and severity of post-operative adhesions were assessed at second-look laparoscopy after 6-12 weeks. Procedures were video-taped for third party, blinded assessment. RESULTS: Safety and tolerability (laboratory variables, adverse events, clinical follow-up) were good with no difference between treatments. A…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/17.4.1031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Icodextrin is too large for direct absorption into blood capillaries; when 4% icodextrin is left in the peritoneum, it is slowly transferred into systemic circulation by peritoneal lymphatic drainage.

    “For example, icodextrin (a starch-based polymer used in Adept® adhesion reduction solution) is too large for direct absorption into blood capillaries. Instead, when 4% icodextrin is left in the peritoneum, it is slowly transferred into systemic circulation by peritoneal lymphatic drainage [256].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
di Zerega, G. S.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2002-04-01
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
1031-1038
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2147984242
Cited by
204
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
icodextrin, postoperative adhesions, gynecologic laparoscopy, adhesiolysis, intraoperative lavage, adhesion prevention, adhesion reformation, second-look laparoscopy, adnexal surgery
MeSH terms
Icodextrin, Tissue Adhesions, Adult, Female, Glucans, Glucose, Humans, Middle Aged, Peritoneal Diseases, Laparoscopy, Pilot Projects, Safety, Solutions, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review