The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modification of endometrial cell biology using progesterone antagonists to manipulate the implantation window
Abstract
The preimplantation effects of progesterone antagonists on the cell biology of the endometrium, corpus luteum function and interactions between these two organs have been studied. The antagonists lilopristone (ZK 98.734) and onapristone (ZK 98.299) were initially given per os to rabbits early or late in pseudopregnancy in combination with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). These protocols were then modified to include hysterectomy or luteotrophic support with 17 beta-oestradiol. Given alone, the antagonists gave rise to endometrial regression (inhibition of epithelial proliferation and differentiation, increase of apoptosis). The simultaneous addition of oestradiol did not alter these findings. A rapid luteolysis occurred when the antagonists were given in late pseudopregnancy, but not if combined with oestradiol or hysterectomy. The endometrium was capable of renewal and of sustaining implantation if the corpora lutea survived or oestradiol was administered, and transferred blastocysts displayed normal implantation and normal embryonic development. These events did not occur when the antagonists were given during late pseudopregnancy without any steroid supplement. Progesterone antagonists can evidently exert a direct inhibitory effect on the endometrium, possibly with a later indirect luteolytic effect via endometrial mediators. Simultaneous addition of a proper luteotrophic signal results in corpora lutea which are refractory to lysis, so revealing a potential functional…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The data may have implications for efforts to manipulate uterine receptivity.
“The data may have implications for efforts to manipulate uterine receptivity.33,34”
From Time of Implantation of the Conceptus and Loss of Pregnancy (1999) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Time of Implantation of the Conceptus and Loss of Pregnancy
Wilcox, A. J., Baird, D. D., & Weinberg, C. R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199906103402304 · Cited by 1,081
Metadata
- Authors
- Beier, H. M., Hegele-Hartung, C., Mootz, U., & Beier-Hellwig, K.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-06-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- 98-115
- ISSN
- 0268-1161
- 1460-2350
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review