The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endometrial micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy suggest the existence of chronic endometritis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: At fluid hysteroscopy the presence of endometrial micropolyps (less than 1 mm of size) is a frequent finding. Although their origin is still unknown, in our experience they are associated with stromal edema, endometrial thickening and periglandular hyperhaemia that suggest the existence of chronic endometritis. This study will aim to describe these lesions and evaluate their inflammatory significance by comparing hysteroscopic and histological findings. METHODS: 820 women underwent hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of the micropolyps presence for the diagnosis of chronic endometritis were calculated. RESULTS: Micropolyps were found in 96 cases (11.7% of all hysteroscopies); in 90 (93.7%) of these cases histology confirmed the presence of chronic endometritis. In women without micropolyps, chronic endometritis was significantly less frequent (78 cases, 10.8%) (P < 0.000001). The likelihood of chronic endometritis for women with micropolyps was very high (odds ratio 124.2, confidence interval 50.3-205.4). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 54%, 99%, 94% and 89%, respectively; the diagnostic accuracy was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of endometrial micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy is significantly associated with endometrial inflammation and can be considered a reliable diagnostic sign for this pathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bouet, P.-E., El Hachem, H., Monceau, E., Gariépy, G., Kadoch, I.-J., & Sylvestre, C. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.025 · Cited by 335
Cicinelli, E., Matteo, M., Tinelli, R., Pinto, V., Marinaccio, M., Indraccolo, U., De Ziegler, D., & Resta, L. (2014) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1177/1933719113508817 · Cited by 333
Self-citationCicinelli, E., De Ziegler, D., Nicoletti, R., Colafiglio, G., Saliani, N., Resta, L., Rizzi, D., & De Vito, D. (2008) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.074 · Cited by 285
Self-citationCicinelli, E., Matteo, M., Trojano, G., Mitola, P. C., Tinelli, R., Vitagliano, A., Crupano, F. M., Lepera, A., Miragliotta, G., & Resta, L. (2018) · American Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1111/aji.12782 · Cited by 283
Self-citationLiu, Y., Chen, X., Huang, J., Wang, C.-C., Yu, M.-Y., Laird, S., & Li, T.-C. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.022 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Cicinelli, E., Resta, L., Nicoletti, R., Zappimbulso, V., Tartagni, M., & Saliani, N.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1386-1389
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2164868903
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endometrial micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy suggest the existence of chronic endometritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/deh779
- The paper
- Cicinelli, E., Resta, L., Nicoletti, R., Zappimbulso, V., Tartagni, M., & Saliani, N. (2005). Endometrial micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy suggest the existence of chronic endometritis. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh779
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.