The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Many variations in oocyte and embryo grading make inter-laboratory comparisons extremely difficult. This paper reports the proceedings of an international consensus meeting on oocyte and embryo morphology assessment. METHODS: Background presentations about current practice were given. RESULTS: The expert panel developed a set of consensus points to define the minimum criteria for oocyte and embryo morphology assessment. CONCLUSIONS: It is expected that the definition of common terminology and standardization of laboratory practice related to embryo morphology assessment will result in more effective comparisons of treatment outcomes. This document is intended to be referenced as a global consensus to allow standardized reporting of the minimum data set required for the accurate description of embryo development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Groenewoud, E. R., Cohlen, B. J., Al-Oraiby, A., Brinkhuis, E. A., Broekmans, F. J. M., de Bruin, J. P., van den Dool, G., Fleisher, K., Friederich, J., Goddijn, M., et al. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew120 · Cited by 213
Rhenman, A., Berglund, L., Brodin, T., Olovsson, M., Milton, K., Hadziosmanovic, N., & Holte, J. (2015) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu295 · Cited by 79
Ferrero, S., Scala, C., Tafi, E., Racca, A., Venturini, P. L., & Leone Roberti Maggiore, U. (2017) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.04.003 · Cited by 57
Ho, V. N. A., Pham, T. D., Nguyen, N. T., Wang, R., Norman, R. J., Mol, B. W., Ho, T. M., & Vuong, L. N. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00756-6 · Cited by 55
Novel DPY19L2 variants in globozoospermic patients and the overcoming this male infertility
Cao, Y.-X., Li, W., Shang, Y.-L., Zhu, F.-X., Yan, J., Chen, L., Tang, W.-H., Xiao, S., Mo, W.-K., Zhang, Z.-G., et al. (2019) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/aja.aja_79_18 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, Balaban, B., Brison, D., Calderon, G., Catt, J., Conaghan, J., Cowan, L., Ebner, T., Gardner, D., Hardarson, T., Lundin, K., Cristina Magli, M., Mortimer, D., Mortimer, S., Munne, S., Royere, D., Scott, L., Smitz, J., Thornhill, A., van Blerkom, J., & Van den Abbeel, E.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04-18
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1270-1283
- ISSN
- 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2350
- OpenAlex
- W2124656409
- Cited by
- 2,015
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humrep/der037
- The paper
- Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, Balaban, B., Brison, D., Calderon, G., Catt, J., Conaghan, J., Cowan, L., Ebner, T., Gardner, D., Hardarson, T., Lundin, K., Cristina Magli, M., Mortimer, D., Mortimer, S., Munne, S., Royere, D., Scott, L., Smitz, J., Thornhill, A., . . . Van den Abbeel, E. (2011). The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
