The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo
Abstract
The maternal to zygotic transition is the first major transition that occurs following fertilization, and entails a dramatic reprogramming of gene expression that is essential for continued development. Although the major reprogramming of gene expression occurs during the 2-cell stage, transcription is evident in the 1-cell embryo, with the male pronucleus supporting a significantly higher level of transcription than the female pronucleus. This difference is likely due to differences in chromatin structure as a consequence of the protamine-histone exchange. Although the 1-cell embryo is transcriptionally competent, transcription and translation appear uncoupled. This transcription, however, may mark promoters for efficient utilization in the 2-cell embryo. Genome activation in the 2-cell embryo is accompanied by a requirement for an enhancer for efficient transcription and the more efficient utilization of TATA-less promoters. These changes in promoter utilization could contribute substantially to the reprogramming of gene expression. Superimposed on genome activation is the development of a chromatin-mediated transcriptionally repressive state that is relieved by either inducing histone hyperacetylation or inhibiting the second round of DNA replication. Since genome activation appears to be a relatively opportunistic process, the development of the transcriptionally repressive state may be a major determinant in establishing the appropriate gene expression profile that is essential for continued development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation
Bird, A. P. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321209a0 · Cited by 3,777
Timely translation during the mouse oocyte-to-embryo transition
Oh, B., Hwang, S.-Y., McLaughlin, J., Solter, D., & Knowles, B. B. (2000) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.127.17.3795 · Cited by 169
Cited by
Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity
Macfarlan, T. S., Gifford, W. D., Driscoll, S., Lettieri, K., Rowe, H. M., Bonanomi, D., Firth, A., Singer, O., Trono, D., & Pfaff, S. L. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11244 · Cited by 981
Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing
Xue, Z., Huang, K., Cai, C., Cai, L., Jiang, C.-Y., Feng, Y., Liu, Z., Zeng, Q., Cheng, L., Sun, Y. E., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12364 · Cited by 963
Guo, G., Huss, M., Tong, G. Q., Wang, C., Li Sun, L., Clarke, N. D., & Robson, P. (2010) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.02.012 · Cited by 815
Protamines and male infertility
Oliva, R. (2006) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dml009 · Cited by 802
The role of 3D genome organization in development and cell differentiation
Zheng, H., & Xie, W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-019-0132-4 · Cited by 719
Metadata
- Authors
- Schultz, R. M.
- Venue
- Human Reproduction Update
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 323-331
- ISSN
- 1355-4786 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2369
- OpenAlex
- W2109556015
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/humupd/8.4.323
- The paper
- Schultz, R. M. (2002). The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. Human Reproduction Update. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.4.323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.