The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptive Significance of Intra- and Interspecific Differences in the Feeding Repertoires of Cichlid Fishes
Open accessAbstract
Intraspecific modulatory multiplicity in the feeding mechanism of cichlids as elucidated by electromyography has profound implications on small-scale trophic events the sum of which is the very core of such large-scale population and evolutionary phenomena as efficiency of trophic exploitation niche width and overlap competition and adaptation. The greatest paradox emerging from the study on intra and interspecific differences in feeding repertoires of cichlid fishes is that the most specialized taxa are not only remarkable specialists in a narrow sense but also jacks-of-all-trades. If specialists are simultaneously jacks of-all-trades how could they have evolved according to the widely accepted hypothesis that broadening the range of usable resources prevents species from specializing on individual types? The organism can be considered to be composed of structural elements and functional components that exert mutual influences. As a result, a network of interacting constraints is set up. The nature of the network determines the direction and range of evolutionary changes the possibilities of optimizing adaptations and built-in variability of the trait. A change in the network can put a static trait into a different context to become dynamic. These changes in variability due to changes in the structure of the network cannot be explained in terms of simple adaptation to the external environment. Fitness is considered to depend on the nature of a network of interacting constraints. The possibilities of optimization the sensitivity of the phenotypic traits to environmental differences and the correlated evolutionary responses of different traits are all related to this network of interacting constraints between the elements and components of the organism. Thus the experimental and comparative studies of these networks of interacting constraints should become an increasingly more important focus for morphologists as they attempt to refine their understanding of adaptation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of planktivorous fishes: Their evolution, feeding behaviours, selectivities, and impacts
Lazzaro, X. (1987) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/bf00008764 · Cited by 565
Character Release and Displacement in Fishes: A Neglected Literature
Robinson, B. W., & Wilson, D. S. (1994) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285696 · Cited by 558
Albertson, R. C., Streelman, J. T., Kocher, T. D., & Yelick, P. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506649102 · Cited by 325
The logic of monsters: Evidence for internal constraint in development and evolution
Alberch, P. (1989) · Geobios · doi:10.1016/s0016-6995(89)80006-3 · Cited by 321
(1997) · PubMed · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- LIEM, K. F.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 295-314
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979996242
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive Significance of Intra- and Interspecific Differences in the Feeding Repertoires of Cichlid Fishes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/20.1.295
- The paper
- LIEM, K. F. (1980). Adaptive Significance of Intra- and Interspecific Differences in the Feeding Repertoires of Cichlid Fishes. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/20.1.295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.