The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions
Abstract
SYNOPSIS. Neighboring males in rhythmically calling insects and anurans often chorus in a synchronizing or alternating fashion. Neuroethological investigations of chorusing species reveal that their rhythms are maintained by pacemakers and that a basic interactive algorithm, common to many species, yields the collective synchrony or alternation observed. Traditionally, synchrony has been viewed as a cooperative event. However, recent evidence suggests that a collective synchronous display can also be an incidental outcome of signal “jamming” activities between neighboring males competing to attract females. This arises when female phonotaxis is influenced by a precedence effect in which the first of two or more closely synchronized calls is preferred. Under such circumstances, males are selected to adopt a timing mechanism averting following calls. If males happen to call at comparable rates, the adopted mechanism can yield synchrony as a by-product. Alternation, too, may be produced by a similar mechanism and also represent an epiphenomenon. That alternation, as opposed to synchrony, results may be a mere artefact of the species' solo calling rate, but perceptual constraints may select specifically for alternation in some species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children
Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.005 · Cited by 494
The Ecology of Entrainment: Foundations of Coordinated Rhythmic Movement
Phillips-Silver, J., Aktipis, C. A., & A. Bryant, G. (2010) · Music Perception · doi:10.1525/mp.2010.28.1.3 · Cited by 368
From Sender to Receiver: Propagation and Environmental Effects on Acoustic Signals
FORREST, T. G. (1994) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/34.6.644 · Cited by 349
Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour
McGregor, P. K., & Peake, T. M. (2000) · Acta ethologica · doi:10.1007/s102110000015 · Cited by 281
Vocal Interactions in Birds: The Use of Song as a Model in Communication
Todt, D., & Naguib, M. (2000) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60107-2 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- GREENFIELD, M. D.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 605-615
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069431618
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/34.6.605
- The paper
- GREENFIELD, M. D. (1994). Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions. American Zoologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/34.6.605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.