The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion
Abstract
Most physiological and ecological approaches to animal locomotion are based on steady state assumptions, yet movements of many animals are interspersed with pauses lasting from milliseconds to minutes. Thus, pauses, along with changes in the duration and speed of moves, form part of a dynamic system of intermittent locomotion by which animals adjust their locomotor behavior to changing circumstances. Intermittent locomotion occurs in a wide array of organisms from protozoans to mammals. It is found in aerial, aquatic and terrestrial locomotion and in many behavioral contexts including search and pursuit of prey, mate search, escape from predators, habitat assessment and general travel. In our survey, animals exhibiting intermittent locomotion paused on average nearly 50% of their locomotion time (range 6–94%). Although intermittent locomotion is usually expected to increase energetic costs as a result of additional expenditure for acceleration and deceleration, a variety of energetic benefits can arise when forward movement continues during pauses. Endurance also can be improved by partial recovery from fatigue during pauses. Perceptual benefits can arise because pauses increase the capacity of the sensory systems to detect relevant stimuli. Several processes, including velocity blur, relative motion detection, foveation, attention and interference between sensory systems are probably involved. In animals that do not pause, alternative mechanisms for stabilizing the perceptual field are often present. Because movement is an important cue for stimulus detection, pauses can also reduce unwanted detection by an organism's predators or prey. Several models have attempted to integrate energetic and perceptual processes, but many challenges remain. Future advances will require improved quantification of the effects of speed on perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
NEURAL SELECTION AND CONTROL OF VISUALLY GUIDED EYE MOVEMENTS
Schall, J. D., & Thompson, K. G. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.241 · Cited by 489
Cited by
Attentive scanning behavior drives one-trial potentiation of hippocampal place fields
Monaco, J. D., Rao, G., Roth, E. D., & Knierim, J. J. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3687 · Cited by 163
Adolph, K. E., & Robinson, S. R. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy204 · Cited by 135
Selection of experience for memory by hippocampal sharp wave ripples
Yang, W., Sun, C., Huszár, R., Hainmueller, T., Kiselev, K., & Buzsáki, G. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adk8261 · Cited by 95
Savelli, F., & Knierim, J. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.188912 · Cited by 93
On Higher Ground: How Well Can Dynamic Body Acceleration Determine Speed in Variable Terrain?
Bidder, O. R., Qasem, L. A., & Wilson, R. P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050556 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Kramer, D. L., & McLaughlin, R. L.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-153
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4234650687
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.