Crocodylian Snouts in Space and Time: Phylogenetic Approaches Toward Adaptive Radiation
Abstract
Recent phylogenetic analyses of fossil and living crocodylians allow us to compare the taxonomic, geographic, and temporal distributions of morphological features, such as snout shapes. A few basic snout morphotypes—generalized, blunt, slender, deep, and excessively broad (“duck-faced”)—occur multiple times in distantly-related lineages. Some clades—especially those found in the Northern Hemisphere or with minimum origination dates in the Cretaceous or lower Tertiary—are morphologically uniform, but geographically widespread; crocodylian faunas of the early Tertiary tend to be composite, with sympatric taxa being distantly related, and similar-looking taxa on different continents being close relatives. In contrast, crocodylian faunas of the later Tertiary tend to be more endemic, with local adaptive radiations occurring in Africa and Australia containing members of most basic snout shapes. Endemic radiations in Africa and Australia have largely been replaced by Crocodylus, which can be divided into subclades that may individually represent endemic adaptive radiations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rampant size changes throughout crocodilian evolution in the fossil record are testament to the importance of scale-mediated changes in feeding biomechanics.
“The rampant size changes that occurred throughout crocodilian evolution in the fossil record [3], [6], [32] are testament to the importance of scale-mediated changes in the feeding biomechanics of these animals.”
From Insights into the Ecology and Evolutionary Success of Crocodilians Revealed through Bite-Force and Tooth-Pressure Experimentation (2012) · cites this paper as [3]
Adult body sizes and cranio-dental anatomy are conspicuously variable among crocodilian species.
“Conversely adult body sizes and cranio-dental anatomy are conspicuously variable [3], [6] (Figure 1).”
From Insights into the Ecology and Evolutionary Success of Crocodilians Revealed through Bite-Force and Tooth-Pressure Experimentation (2012) · cites this paper as [3]
Cites
Phylogenetics, taxonomy, and historical biogeography of Alligatoroidea.
Brochu, C. A. (1999) · Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology · doi:10.1080/02724634.1999.10011201 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Erickson, G. M., Gignac, P. M., Steppan, S. J., Lappin, A. K., Vliet, K. A., Brueggen, J. D., Inouye, B. D., Kledzik, D., & Webb, G. J. W. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031781 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brochu, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Field Museum of Natural History (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brochu, Christopher A.
- Venue
- American Zoologist
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 564-585
- ISSN
- 0003-1569 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4211033067
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Zoologist (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology (SICB)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- crocodilians, snout morphology, adaptive radiation, phylogenetic analysis, morphological convergence, fossil crocodilians, endemic radiation, Crocodylus, Cretaceous
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review