The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power Requirements of Swimming: Do New Methods Resolve Old Questions?
Open accessAbstract
A recurring question in the study of fish biomechanics and energetics is the mechanical power required for tail-swimming at the high speeds seen among aquatic vertebrates. The quest for answers has been driven by conceptual advances in fluid dynamics, starting with ideas on the boundary layer and drag initiated by Prandtl, and in measurement techniques starting with force balances focussing on drag and thrust. Drag (=thrust) from measurements on physical models, carcasses, kinematics as inputs to hydromechanical models, and physiological power sources vary from less than that expected for an equivalent rigid reference to over an order of magnitude greater. Estimates of drag and thrust using recent advances largely made possible by increased computing power have not resolved the discrepancy. Sources of drag and thrust are not separable in axial undulatory self propulsion, are open to interpretation and Froude efficiency is zero. Wakes are not easily interpreted, especially for thrust evaluation. We suggest the best measures of swimming performance are velocity and power consumption for which 2D inviscid simulations can give realistic predictions. Steady swimming power is several times that required for towing an equivalent flat plate at the same speed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying.
Walker, J. A., & Westneat, M. W. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1224 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Borazjani, I., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.015644 · Cited by 512
Simulations of optimized anguilliform swimming
Kern, S., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02526 · Cited by 420
Optimal Strouhal number for swimming animals
Eloy, C. (2012) · Journal of Fluids and Structures · doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.02.008 · Cited by 306
Borazjani, I., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.025007 · Cited by 258
Aerodynamics of wing-assisted incline running in birds
Tobalske, B. W., & Dial, K. P. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.001701 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Schultz, W. W.
- Venue
- Integrative and Comparative Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1018-1025
- ISSN
- 1540-7063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7023
- OpenAlex
- W2143399627
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power Requirements of Swimming: Do New Methods Resolve Old Questions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icb/42.5.1018
- The paper
- Schultz, W. W. (2002). Power Requirements of Swimming: Do New Methods Resolve Old Questions? Integrative and Comparative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.5.1018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.