The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pragmatic collaborations: advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism
Abstract
This paper starts from the observation that firms are increasingly engaging in collaborations with their suppliers, even as they are reducing the extent to which they are vertically integrated with those suppliers. This fact seems incompatible with traditional theories of the firm, which argue that integration is necessary to avoid the potential for hold-ups created when non-contractible investments are made. Our view is that pragmatist mechanisms such as benchmarking, simultaneous engineering and 'root cause' error detection and correction make possible 'learning by monitoring' - a relationship in which firms and their collaborators continuously improve their joint products and processes without the need for a clear division of property rights. We argue that pragmatic collaborations based on 'learning by monitoring' both advance knowledge and control opportunism and thus align interests between the collaborators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.502 · Cited by 3,078
Cited by
Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation
Kapoor, R. (2018) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1186/s41469-018-0035-4 · Cited by 504
The Robot Revolution: Managerial and Employment Consequences for Firms
Dixon, J., Hong, B., & Wu, L. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3812 · Cited by 463
The mirroring hypothesis: theory, evidence, and exceptions
Colfer, L. J., & Baldwin, C. Y. (2016) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtw027 · Cited by 331
Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0568 · Cited by 152
Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster
Perez-Aleman, P. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0514 · Cited by 120
Information technology, Repeated Contracts, and the Number of Suppliers
Aral, S., Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2631 · Cited by 65
Internationalization of supply networks inside and outside clusters
Chiarvesio, M., & Di Maria, E. (2009) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570911000186 · Cited by 43
(2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics
Metadata
- Authors
- Helper, S.
- Venue
- Industrial and Corporate Change
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 443-488
- ISSN
- 0960-6491 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3650
- OpenAlex
- W2119836473
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.