The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management
Open accessAbstract
Smith, A. D. M., Fulton, E. J., Hobday, A. J., Smith, D. C., and Shoulder, P. 2007. Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 633–639. Ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has emerged during the past 5 y as an alternative approach to single-species fishery management. To date, policy development has generally outstripped application and implementation. The EBFM approach has been broadly adopted at a policy level within Australia through a variety of instruments including fisheries legislation, environmental legislation, and a national policy on integrated oceans management. The speed of policy adoption has necessitated equally rapid development of scientific and management tools to support practical implementation. We discuss some of the scientific tools that have been developed to meet this need. These tools include extension of the management strategy evaluation (MSE) approach to evaluate broader ecosystem-based fishery management strategies (using the Atlantis modelling framework), development of new approaches to ecological risk assessment (ERA) for evaluating the ecological impacts of fishing, and development of a harvest strategy framework (HSF) and policy that forms the basis for a broader EBFM strategy. The practical application of these tools (MSE, ERA, and HSF) is illustrated for the southern and eastern fisheries of Australia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support
Uusitalo, L., Lehikoinen, A., Helle, I., & Myrberg, K. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.017 · Cited by 538
An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes
Popper, A. N., & Hawkins, A. D. (2019) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.13948 · Cited by 445
NEW HORIZONS FOR MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW OF COUPLED SOCIAL‐ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS MODELING
SCHLÜTER, M., MCALLISTER, R. R. J., ARLINGHAUS, R., BUNNEFELD, N., EISENACK, K., HÖLKER, F., MILNER‐GULLAND, E. J., MÜLLER, B., NICHOLSON, E., QUAAS, M., et al. (2012) · Natural Resource Modeling · doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00108.x · Cited by 373
Marchal, P., Andersen, J. L., Aranda, M., Fitzpatrick, M., Goti, L., Guyader, O., Haraldsson, G., Hatcher, A., Hegland, T. J., Le Floc'h, P., et al. (2016) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12147 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, A. D. M., Fulton, E. J., Hobday, A. J., Smith, D. C., & Shoulder, P.
- Venue
- ICES Journal of Marine Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-04-16
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 633-639
- ISSN
- 1054-3139 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9289
- OpenAlex
- W2114364088
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icesjms/fsm041
- The paper
- Smith, A. D. M., Fulton, E. J., Hobday, A. J., Smith, D. C., & Shoulder, P. (2007). Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.