The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Delirium after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Delirium after cardiac surgery is a problem with consequences for patients and healthcare. Preventive strategies from known risk factors may reduce the incidence and severity of delirium. The present aim was to explore risk factors behind delirium in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Patients (≥70 years) scheduled for routine cardiac surgery were included (n = 142). The patients were assessed and monitored pre-/postoperatively, and delirium was diagnosed from repeated assessments with the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Organic Brain Syndrome Scale, using the DSM-IV-TR criteria. Variables were analysed by uni-/multivariable logistic regression, including both preoperative variables (predisposing) and those extracted during surgery and in the early postoperative period (precipitating). RESULTS: Delirium was diagnosed in 78 patients (54.9%). Delirium was independently associated with both predisposing and precipitating factors (P-value, odds ratio, upper/lower confidence interval): age (0.036, 1.1, 1.0/1.2), diabetes (0.032, 3.5, 1.1/11.0), gastritis/ulcer problems (0.050, 4.0, 1.0/16.1), volume load during operation (0.001, 2.8, 1.5/5.1), ventilator time in ICU (0.042, 1.2, 1.0/1.4), highest temperature recorded in ICU (0.044, 2.2, 1.0/4.8) and sodium concentration in ICU (0.038, 1.2, 1.0/1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Delirium was common among older patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Both predisposing and precipitating factors contributed to delirium. When combined, the predictive strength of the model improved. Preventive strategies may be considered, in particular among the precipitating factors. Of interest, delirium was strongly associated with an increased volume load during surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sheikh (1986) · doi:10.1300/j018v05n01_09 · Cited by 7,236
Adverse Cerebral Outcomes after Coronary Bypass Surgery
Roach, G. W., Kanchuger, M., Mangano, C. M., Newman, M., Nussmeier, N., Wolman, R., Aggarwal, A., Marschall, K., Graham, S. H., Ley, C., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199612193352501 · Cited by 1,860
Cited by
Predisposing and Precipitating Factors Associated With Delirium: A Systematic Review
Ormseth, C. H., LaHue, S. C., Oldham, M. A., Josephson, S. A., Whitaker, E., & Douglas, V. C. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49950 · Cited by 316
Risk factors of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis
Chen, H., Mo, L., Hu, H., Ou, Y., & Luo, J. (2021) · Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13019-021-01496-w · Cited by 265
Cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of delirium in non-ICU settings
Yu, A., Wu, S., Zhang, Z., Dening, T., Zhao, S., Pinner, G., Xia, J., & Yang, D. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012494.pub2 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Smulter, N., Lingehall, H. C., Gustafson, Y., Olofsson, B., & Engström, K. G.
- Venue
- Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 790-796
- ISSN
- 1569-9285 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-9293
- OpenAlex
- W2106997285
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delirium after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/icvts/ivt323
- The paper
- Smulter, N., Lingehall, H. C., Gustafson, Y., Olofsson, B., & Engström, K. G. (2013). Delirium after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.