EEG-based classification of motor imagery tasks using fractal dimension and neural network for brain-computer interface.
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we propose a method of classifying a spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) approach to a brain-computer interface. Ten subjects, aged 21-32 years, volunteered to imagine left-and right- hand movements. An independent component analysis based on a fixed-point algorithm is used to eliminate the activities found in the EEG signals. We use a fractal dimension value to reveal the embedded potential responses in the human brain. The different fractal dimension values between the relaxing and imaging periods are computed. Featured data is classified by a three-layer feed-forward neural network based on a simple backpropagation algorithm. Two conventional methods, namely, the use of the autoregressive (AR) model and the band power estimation (BPE) as features, and the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) as a classifier, are selected for comparison in this study. Experimental results show that the proposed method is more effective than the conventional methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Features of MI are often accompanied by changes in frequency band energy, i.e., event-related desynchronization/event-related synchronization.
“One possible reason might be that the features of MI are often accompanied by changes in frequency band energy, i.e., event-related desynchronization (ERD)/event-related synchronization (ERS; Phothisonothai and Nakagawa, 2008; Balconi and Mazza, 2009).”
From Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Phothisonothai and Nakagawa, 2008
Cites
Motor imagery classification by means of source analysis for brain–computer interface applications
Qin, L., Ding, L., & He, B. (2004) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/1/3/002 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data augmentation for motor imagery signal classification based on a hybrid neural network.
Zhang, K., Xu, G., Han, Z., Ma, K., Zheng, X., Chen, L., Duan, N., & Zhang, S. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20164485 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review
He, C., Liu, J., Zhu, Y., & Du, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.765525 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- PHOTHISONOTHAI, M., & NAKAGAWA, M.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (JP)
- Venue
- IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- E91-D
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-53
- ISSN
- 0916-8532 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1361
- OpenAlex
- W2075044701
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15300070)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Keywords
- motor imagery classification, brain-computer interface, EEG, fractal dimension, independent component analysis, feedforward neural networks, hand movement imagery, autoregressive models, linear discriminant analysis, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review