Cited by 33EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionMuscle activation and electromyography studies

EEG-based classification of motor imagery tasks using fractal dimension and neural network for brain-computer interface.

Open access
PHOTHISONOTHAI, M., NAKAGAWA, M.·2008·IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems

Abstract

In this study, we propose a method of classifying a spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) approach to a brain-computer interface. Ten subjects, aged 21-32 years, volunteered to imagine left-and right- hand movements. An independent component analysis based on a fixed-point algorithm is used to eliminate the activities found in the EEG signals. We use a fractal dimension value to reveal the embedded potential responses in the human brain. The different fractal dimension values between the relaxing and imaging periods are computed. Featured data is classified by a three-layer feed-forward neural network based on a simple backpropagation algorithm. Two conventional methods, namely, the use of the autoregressive (AR) model and the band power estimation (BPE) as features, and the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) as a classifier, are selected for comparison in this study. Experimental results show that the proposed method is more effective than the conventional methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ietisy/e91-d.1.44

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Features of MI are often accompanied by changes in frequency band energy, i.e., event-related desynchronization/event-related synchronization.

    “One possible reason might be that the features of MI are often accompanied by changes in frequency band energy, i.e., event-related desynchronization (ERD)/event-related synchronization (ERS; Phothisonothai and Nakagawa, 2008; Balconi and Mazza, 2009).”

    From Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Phothisonothai and Nakagawa, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PHOTHISONOTHAI, M., & NAKAGAWA, M.
Affiliations
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (JP)
Venue
IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
E91-D
Issue
1
Pages
44-53
ISSN
  • 0916-8532 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1361
OpenAlex
W2075044701
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15300070)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
motor imagery classification, brain-computer interface, EEG, fractal dimension, independent component analysis, feedforward neural networks, hand movement imagery, autoregressive models, linear discriminant analysis, feature extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review