Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Methodological Review of Non-Therapeutic Intervention Trials Employing Cluster Randomization, 1979–1989

DONNER, ALLAN, BROWN, K STEPHEN, BRASHER, PENNY·1990·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

A methodological review is presented of 16 non-therapeutic intervention trials published over the last decade which have randomized intact clusters rather than individuals in treatment groups. Each of the trials was surveyed as to the information supplied on six methodological criteria. Although there is increasing recognition of the methodological issues associated with cluster randomization, many investigators are still not aware of the impact of this design on sample size requirements and analysis considerations. Investigators are urged to publish the cluster-specific event rates observed in their trials as a guide for the planning of future studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/19.4.795

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
DONNER, A., BROWN, K. S., & BRASHER, P.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1990
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
795-800
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2078780468
Cited by
174
References
0
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Methodological Review of Non-Therapeutic Intervention Trials Employing Cluster Randomization, 1979–1989. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/19.4.795
The paper
DONNER, A., BROWN, K. S., & BRASHER, P. (1990). A Methodological Review of Non-Therapeutic Intervention Trials Employing Cluster Randomization, 1979–1989. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/19.4.795

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.