The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Malignant Melanoma in England: Risks Associated with Naevi, Freckles, Social Class, Hair Colour, and Sunburn
Abstract
In a case-control study in the Midlands of England, 195 subjects with superficial spreading or nodular melanoma were compared to age- and sex-matched controls chosen from all inpatients or outpatients in hospitals serving the defined source population. Significant increases in melanoma risk, after adjustment for other factors, were seen in association with total naevi on the arms (odds ratio (OR), for 15+ naevi compared to none = 3.8), intense freckling as an adult (OR = 6.2), and as a child (OR = 6.0), and higher social class (OR = 2.4). Positive single factor associations were also seen with light or red hair colour, tendency to sunburn easily, and a history of sunburn at ages 8-12, although these were not significant when adjusted for the other factors. No significant effect was seen with naevi greater than 6 mm, or with raised naevi, when adjusted for total number of naevi. Total arm naevi and density of freckling had independent effects, consistent with a multiplicative effect, the OR in those with 10+ naevi and heavy freckling being 20.8. The risk associated with red hair was independent of naevi, but associated with freckling. The strongest association with sunburn history was seen with a history of sunburn in childhood, with sunburn at later times, having smaller effects, or none. These results shows that freckling and social class as well as naevi are strong and independent risk indicators for melanoma. These associations were generally consistent by type of melanoma, sex, age, and extent of regular exposure of the body site affected, although the social class gradient was observed neither for nodular melanoma nor for melanomas occurring on the most exposed body sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure
Gandini, S., Sera, F., Cattaruzza, M. S., Pasquini, P., Picconi, O., Boyle, P., & Melchi, C. F. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.016 · Cited by 1,266
Gandini, S., Sera, F., Cattaruzza, M. S., Pasquini, P., Zanetti, R., Masini, C., Boyle, P., & Melchi, C. F. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.034 · Cited by 787
Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies
Whiteman, D. C., Whiteman, C. A., & Green, A. C. (2001) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1023/a:1008980919928 · Cited by 633
Sunburns and risk of cutaneous melanoma: does age matter? A comprehensive meta-analysis
Dennis, L. K., Vanbeek, M. J., Beane Freeman, L. E., Smith, B. J., Dawson, D. V., & Coughlin, J. A. (2008) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.04.006 · Cited by 370
The Asp84Glu variant of the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) is associated with melanoma
Valverde, P. (1996) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/5.10.1663 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- ELWOOD, J. M., WHITEHEAD, S. M., DAVISON, J., STEWART, M., & GALT, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 801-810
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2145630017
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Malignant Melanoma in England: Risks Associated with Naevi, Freckles, Social Class, Hair Colour, and Sunburn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/19.4.801
- The paper
- ELWOOD, J. M., WHITEHEAD, S. M., DAVISON, J., STEWART, M., & GALT, M. (1990). Malignant Melanoma in England: Risks Associated with Naevi, Freckles, Social Class, Hair Colour, and Sunburn. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/19.4.801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.