The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trends in coronary risk factors in the WHO MONICA Project
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) MONICA Project was established to determine how trends in event rates for coronary heart disease (CHD) and, optionally, stroke were related to trends in classic coronary risk factors. Risk factors were therefore monitored over ten years across 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents (overall period covered: 1979-1996). METHODS: A standard protocol was applied across participating centres, in at least two, and usually three, independent surveys conducted on random samples of the study populations, well separated within the 10-year study period. RESULTS: Smoking rates decreased in most male populations (35-64 years) but in females the majority showed increases. Systolic blood pressure showed decreasing trends in the majority of centres in both sexes. Mean levels of cholesterol generally showed downward trends, which, although the changes were small, had large effects on risk. There was a trend of increasing body mass index (BMI) with half the female populations and two-thirds of the male populations showing a significant increase. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to monitor the classic CHD risk factors in diverse populations through repeated surveys over a decade. In general, the risk factor trends are downwards in most populations but in particular, an increase in smoking in women in many populations and increasing BMI, especially in men, are worrying findings with significant public health implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Finucane, M. M., Stevens, G. A., Cowan, M. J., Danaei, G., Lin, J. K., Paciorek, C. J., Singh, G. M., Gutierrez, H. R., Lu, Y., Bahalim, A. N., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62037-5 · Cited by 4,050
Zhou, B., Bentham, J., Di Cesare, M., Bixby, H., Danaei, G., Cowan, M. J., Paciorek, C. J., Singh, G., Hajifathalian, K., Bennett, J. E., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31919-5 · Cited by 2,579
Self-citationDanaei, G., Finucane, M. M., Lin, J. K., Singh, G. M., Paciorek, C. J., Cowan, M. J., Farzadfar, F., Stevens, G. A., Lim, S. S., Riley, L. M., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62036-3 · Cited by 1,239
Epidemiological studies of CHD and the evolution of preventive cardiology
Wong, N. D. (2014) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.26 · Cited by 658
Jhund, P. S., MacIntyre, K., Simpson, C. R., Lewsey, J. D., Stewart, S., Redpath, A., Chalmers, J. W. T., Capewell, S., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.108.812172 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, A., Tolonen, H., Hense, H.-W., Ferrario, M., Sans, S., & Kuulasmaa, K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- suppl 1
- Pages
- S35-S40
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2110693998
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in coronary risk factors in the WHO MONICA Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/30.suppl_1.s35
- The paper
- Evans, A., Tolonen, H., Hense, H.-W., Ferrario, M., Sans, S., & Kuulasmaa, K. (2001). Trends in coronary risk factors in the WHO MONICA Project. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.suppl_1.s35
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.