Cited by 48Ear Surgery and Otitis MediaEnergy and Environment ImpactsPediatric health and respiratory diseases

Household wood and charcoal smoke increases risk of otitis media in childhood in Maputo

da Costa, J. L.·2004·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the association of otitis media in children <6 years old and the exposure to wood and charcoal smoke, as well as to other risk factors, in Maputo. METHODS: Case-control study. In all 750 children matched by sex and age were enrolled in a hospital-community study. Cases were gathered from among children visiting the Central Hospital of Maputo with otitis media and controls were recruited in the same village as the cases. Conditional logistic regression was performed to evaluate, simultaneously, the effect of each risk factor. RESULTS: Cases were more likely to have been exposed to tobacco smoke (OR = 1.51), to wood (OR = 1.85) and charcoal (OR = 1.50) household smoke, to short term breastfeeding (OR = 1.47), and to live in overcrowded conditions (OR = 1.49). Multivariate analysis stratified by age groups (younger and older than 2 years) showed that cases were more likely to be exposed to wood and charcoal smoke than controls, regardless of age. Among children aged >2 years, Eustachian tube dysfunction was evident (OR = 3.06) particularly in those living in less overcrowded conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of this study are consistent with earlier studies that have reported an association between parental smoking, short duration of breastfeeding, and Eustachian tube dysfunction. The association with wood and charcoal smoke indicates that there is a need to educate people regarding the avoidance of exposing their children to this environmental hazard.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyh071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other health outcomes associated with household air pollution, for which evidence is less robust, include pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, otitis media, asthma, tuberculosis, neonatal mortality and nutritional deficit.

    “Other health outcomes associated with household air pollution, for which evidence is less robust, include pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer,10,11 otitis media,12 asthma,13,14 tuberculosis,15 neonatal mortality16 and nutritional deficit.17”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
da Costa, J. L.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2004-05-27
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
573-578
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2106321597
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
Keywords
otitis media, pediatric respiratory infection, tobacco smoke exposure, breastfeeding duration, overcrowding, Eustachian tube dysfunction, environmental risk factors, Maputo
MeSH terms
Breast Feeding, Charcoal, Child, Preschool, Environmental Exposure, Family Characteristics, Female, Household Products, Humans, Infant, Male, Mozambique, Otitis Media, Risk Factors, Smoke, Wood, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review