The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study)
Open accessAbstract
The 1958 birth cohort or the National Child Development Study (NCDS) began as a study of Perinatal Mortality focussing on just over 17 000 births in a single week in 1958. To address concerns regarding the stillbirth rate not falling, the original study aimed to identify social and obstetric factors linked to stillbirth and neonatal death. The findings contributed to the improvement of maternity services in Britain and to a reduction in perinatal mortality.1 The initial survey was not planned as a longitudinal study, but subsequently the National Children's Bureau was commissioned by the Central Advisory Council for Education (The Plowden Committee) to retrace the cohort at age 7 and monitor their educational, physical, and social development.2 Further surveys took place when children were aged 11 and 16.3,4 This cohort was educated during a period when there was considerable debate about the nature of primary schooling, the selection for secondary school (the ‘eleven-plus’) was being abolished, and the comprehensive sector of secondary schooling was expanding. The school leaving age was raised to 16 yr in 1973 making cohort members part of the first year group required to stay on at school for an extra year. Divorce rates, though rising during the 1960s, were still relatively low and most of this cohort lived with both parents throughout their childhood. In other respects, the cohort grew up in an environment which differed from that experienced by children today, with proportionately more children living in houses that lacked basic amenities, although access to welfare provision, such as free school meals, was available. Breast-feeding was relatively common, and so too was maternal smoking in pregnancy. This generation was not exposed to the levels of childhood obesity seen nowadays and rates of teenage drug taking were low.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of pneumonia and whooping cough in childhood on adult lung function
Johnston, I. D. A., Strachan, D. P., & Anderson, H. R. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199802263380904 · Cited by 169
Cited by
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
The Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium, Barrett, J. C., Clayton, D. G., Concannon, P., Akolkar, B., Cooper, J. D., Erlich, H. A., Julier, C., Morahan, G., Nerup, J., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.381 · Cited by 1,746
GERAD1 Consortium, Pardiñas, A. F., CRESTAR Consortium, Holmans, P., Pocklington, A. J., Escott-Price, V., Ripke, S., Carrera, N., Legge, S. E., Bishop, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2 · Cited by 1,552
Browning, B. L., & Browning, S. R. (2009) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005 · Cited by 1,640
(2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60110-x · Cited by 1,146
Metadata
- Authors
- Power, C., & Elliott, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-09-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-41
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2131715067
- Cited by
- 975
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 67.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/dyi183
- The paper
- Power, C., & Elliott, J. (2006). Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study). International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.