The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in Iran
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although measuring socioeconomic inequality in population health indicators like infant mortality is important, more interesting for policy purposes is to try to explain infant mortality inequality. The objective of this paper is to quantify for the first time the determinants' contributions of socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in Iran. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of 108 875 live births from October 1990 to September 1999 was selected. The data were taken from the Iranian Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted in 2000. Households' socioeconomic status was measured using principal component analysis. The concentration index of infant mortality was used as our measure of socioeconomic inequality and decomposed into its determining factors. RESULTS: The largest contributions to inequality in infant mortality were owing to household economic status (36.2%) and mother's education (20.9%). Residency in rural/urban areas (13.9%), birth interval (13.0%), and hygienic status of toilet (11.9%) also proved important contributors to the measured inequality. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in Iran is determined not only by health system functions but also by factors beyond the scope of health authorities and care delivery system. This implies that in addition to reducing inequalities in wealth and education, investments in water and sanitation infrastructure and programmes (especially in rural areas) are necessary to realize improvements of inequality in infant mortality across society. These findings can be instrumental for the recent 5 year Economic, Social and Cultural Development Plan of Iran, which identified the reduction of inequalities in social determinants of health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The burden of disease and injury in Iran 2003
Naghavi, M., Abolhassani, F., Pourmalek, F., Moradi Lakeh, M., Jafari, N., Vaseghi, S., Mahdavi Hezaveh, N., & Kazemeini, H. (2009) · Population Health Metrics · doi:10.1186/1478-7954-7-9 · Cited by 358
Self-citationHosseinpoor, A. R., Nambiar, D., Tawilah, J., Schlotheuber, A., Briot, B., Bateman, M., Davey, T., Kusumawardani, N., Myint, T., Nuryetty, M. T., et al. (2018) · Global Health Action · doi:10.1080/16549716.2017.1419739 · Cited by 27
Self-citationLuo, Z.-C., Wilkins, R., Heaman, M., Martens, P., Smylie, J., Hart, L., Simonet, F., Wassimi, S., Wu, Y., & Fraser, W. D. (2010) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00279.x · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosseinpoor, A. R., Van Doorslaer, E., Speybroeck, N., Naghavi, M., Mohammad, K., Majdzadeh, R., Delavar, B., Jamshidi, H., & Vega, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-19
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1211-1219
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2120143562
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in Iran. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/dyl164
- The paper
- Hosseinpoor, A. R., Van Doorslaer, E., Speybroeck, N., Naghavi, M., Mohammad, K., Majdzadeh, R., Delavar, B., Jamshidi, H., & Vega, J. (2006). Decomposing socioeconomic inequality in infant mortality in Iran. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.