Cited by 203Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Light drinking in pregnancy, a risk for behavioural problems and cognitive deficits at 3 years of age?

Kelly, Y., Sacker, A., Gray, R., Kelly, J., Wolke, D., Quigley, M. A·2009·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether there was an association between mothers' light drinking during pregnancy and risk of behavioural problems, and cognitive deficits in their children at age 3 years. METHODS: Data from the first two sweeps of the nationally representative prospective UK Millennium Cohort study were used. Drinking patterns during pregnancy and behavioural and cognitive outcomes were assessed during interviews and home visits. Behavioural problems were indicated by scores falling above defined clinically relevant cut-offs on the parent-report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Cognitive ability was assessed using the naming vocabulary subscale from the British Ability Scale (BAS) and the Bracken School Readiness Assessment (BSRA). RESULTS: There was a J-shaped relationship between mothers drinking during pregnancy and the likelihood of high scores (above the cut-off) on the total difficulties scale of the SDQ and the conduct problems, hyperactivity and emotional symptom SDQ subscales. Children born to light drinkers were less likely to score above the cut-offs compared with children of abstinent mothers. Children born to heavy drinkers were more likely to score above the cut-offs compared with children of abstinent mothers. Boys born to mothers who had up to 1-2 drinks per week or per occasion were less likely to have conduct problems (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45-0.77) and hyperactivity (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.94). These effects remained in fully adjusted models. Girls were less likely to have emotional symptoms (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.51-1.01) and peer problems (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.92) compared with those born to abstainers. These effects were attenuated in fully adjusted models. Boys born to light drinkers had higher cognitive ability test scores [standard deviations, (95% CI)] BAS 0.15 (0.08-0.23) BSRA 0.24 (0.16-0.32) compared with boys born to abstainers. The difference for BAS was attenuated on adjustment for socio-economic factors, whilst the difference for BSRA remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Children born to mothers who drank up to 1-2 drinks per week or per occasion during pregnancy were not at increased risk of clinically relevant behavioural difficulties or cognitive deficits compared with children of abstinent mothers. Heavy drinking during pregnancy appears to be associated with behavioural problems and cognitive deficits in offspring at age 3 years whereas light drinking does not.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyn230

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For low amounts of alcohol (8-28 g per occasion), several studies have found that there is no increased risk of behavioural and/or developmental deficits in children.

    “For low amounts of alcohol (8–28 g per occasion), several studies have found that there is no increased risk of behavioural and/or developmental deficits in children 69, 71, 72, 73.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 203

Authors
Kelly, Y., Sacker, A., Gray, R., Kelly, J., Wolke, D., & Quigley, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Essex (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Y.
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2008-10-30
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
129-140
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2126071257
Cited by
203
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (RES518285001, ES/G002452/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
maternal alcohol consumption, child behavior problems, conduct problems, hyperactivity, emotional symptoms, peer problems, cognitive ability, school readiness, sex differences, Millennium Cohort Study, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, prenatal alcohol exposure, socioeconomic factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Child Behavior Disorders, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Temperance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review