The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mean population salt intake estimated from 24-h urine samples and spot urine samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Estimating equations based on spot urine samples have been identified as a possible alternative approach to 24-h urine collections for determining mean population salt intake. This review compares estimates of mean population salt intake based upon spot and 24-h urine samples. METHODS: We systematically searched for all studies that reported estimates of daily salt intake based upon both spot and 24-h urine samples for the same population. The associations between the two were quantified and compared overall and in subsets of studies. RESULTS: A total of 538 records were identified, 108 were assessed as full text and 29 were included. The included studies involved 10,414 participants from 34 countries and made 71 comparisons available for the primary analysis. Overall average population salt intake estimated from 24-h urine samples was 9.3 g/day compared with 9.0 g/day estimated from the spot urine samples. Estimates based upon spot urine samples had excellent sensitivity (97%) and specificity (100%) at classifying mean population salt intake as above or below the World Health Organization maximum target of 5 g/day. Compared with the 24-h samples, estimates based upon spot urine overestimated intake at lower levels of consumption and underestimated intake at higher levels of consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of mean population salt intake based upon spot urine samples can provide countries with a good indication of mean population salt intake and whether action on salt consumption is required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1752 · Cited by 1,267
Global Sodium Consumption and Death from Cardiovascular Causes
Mozaffarian, D., Fahimi, S., Singh, G. M., Micha, R., Khatibzadeh, S., Engell, R. E., Lim, S., Danaei, G., Ezzati, M., & Powles, J. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1304127 · Cited by 1,218
Urinary Sodium and Potassium Excretion, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Events
O'Donnell, M., Mente, A., Rangarajan, S., McQueen, M. J., Wang, X., Liu, L., Yan, H., Lee, S. F., Mony, P., Devanath, A., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1311889 · Cited by 886
Cited by
Huang, L., Trieu, K., Yoshimura, S., Neal, B., Woodward, M., Campbell, N. R. C., Li, Q., Lackland, D. T., Leung, A. A., Anderson, C. A. M., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m315 · Cited by 403
Self-citationImpact of Salt Intake on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Hypertension
Rust, P., & Ekmekcioglu, C. (2016) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/5584_2016_147 · Cited by 286
Santos, J. A., Trieu, K., Raj, T. S., Arcand, J., Johnson, C., Webster, J., & McLean, R. (2017) · The Journal of Clinical Hypertension · doi:10.1111/jch.12971 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, L., Crino, M., Wu, J. H., Woodward, M., Barzi, F., Land, M.-A., McLean, R., Webster, J., Enkhtungalag, B., & Neal, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-01-21
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 239-250
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2302120369
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mean population salt intake estimated from 24-h urine samples and spot urine samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ije/dyv313
- The paper
- Huang, L., Crino, M., Wu, J. H., Woodward, M., Barzi, F., Land, M.-A., McLean, R., Webster, J., Enkhtungalag, B., & Neal, B. (2016). Mean population salt intake estimated from 24-h urine samples and spot urine samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.