Cited by 21Ophthalmology and Visual Health ResearchOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesRetinal Imaging and Analysis

Increasing access to eye care … there's an app for that. Peek: smartphone technology for eye health

Bastawrous, Andrew·2016·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Peek, the Portable Eye Examination Kit, was developed and validated alongside a cohort study of eye disease in Nakuru, Kenya.1 In the cohort, the majority of participants with visual impairment were elderly, difficult to reach and had little or no access to eye care. Expertise and ophthalmic equipment required to perform a comprehensive eye examination in areas with poor or no road access, no electricity and considerable distances from the main towns and cities leads to an inverse relationship between eye care provision and eye care needs.2 In the past decade, mobile phone penetration has grown to reach near ubiquity in many of the most remote parts of the world. The growth has been greatest in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) with some countries having, on average, more than one connected device per person of population.3 Despite areas of Kenya and other LMIC having no access to clean running water and sanitation services, the majority do have mobile phone connectivity. Peek harnesses the portability and connectivity of mobile devices to enable task-shifting and the ability to undertake a comprehensive eye examination at, or close to, the patient’s home.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyw086

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bastawrous, A.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Bastawrous, Andrew
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2016-05-22
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
dyw086
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2397886199
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
mobile health, access to eye care, visual impairment, task shifting, low- and middle-income countries
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Eye Diseases, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review