Cited by 117Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival analysis of the association between antenatal care attendance and neonatal mortality in 57 low- and middle-income countries

Open access
Doku, David T, Neupane, Subas·2017·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality is unacceptably high in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In these countries, where access to emergency obstetric services is limited, antenatal care (ANC) utilization offers improved maternal health and birth outcomes. However, evidence for this is scanty and mixed. We explored the association between attendance for ANC and survival of neonates in 57 LMICs. Methods: Employing standardized protocols to ensure comparison across countries, we used nationally representative cross-sectional data from 57 LMICs (N = 464 728) to investigate the association between ANC visits and neonatal mortality. Cox proportional hazards multivariable regression models and meta-regression analysis were used to analyse pooled data from the countries. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to describe the patterns of neonatal survival in each region. Results: After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we found 55% lower risk of neonatal mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42–0.48] among women who met both WHO recommendations for ANC (first visit within the first trimester and at least four visits during pregnancy) in pooled analysis. Furthermore, meta-analysis of country-level risk shows 32% lower risk of neonatal mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61–0.75) among those who met at least one WHO recommendation. In addition, ANC attendance was associated with lower neonatal mortality in all the regions except in the Middle East and North Africa. Conclusions: ANC attendance is protective against neonatal mortality in the LMICs studied, although differences exist across countries and regions. Increasing ANC visits, along with other known effective interventions, can improve neonatal survival in these countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/dyx125

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reports relying on health sector data show that rates of receiving at least 4 ANC visits in Cox's Bazar are now around 77%.

    “Reports relying on health sector data show that ANC coverage and facility-based births have gradually increased since 2017 and rates of receiving at least 4 ANC visits are now around 77%43”

    From Predictors of antenatal care utilization among the Rohingya population in the refugee camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Methods (Data source; page unavailable) describe surveys from 2005–2015 across 57 countries, not health-sector reports tracking Cox’s Bazar since 2017. The Results (Table 2; page unavailable) give a pooled figure of 56.7% for four or more ANC visits. Searches for Cox’s Bazar, 77%, and post-2017 coverage or facility-birth trends found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ANC coverage and facility-based births in Cox's Bazar have gradually increased since 2017.

    “Reports relying on health sector data show that ANC coverage and facility-based births have gradually increased since 2017 and rates of receiving at least 4 ANC visits are now around 77%43”

    From Predictors of antenatal care utilization among the Rohingya population in the refugee camps of Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Methods (Data source; page not supplied) describe surveys from 2005–2015 across 57 countries, not health-sector reports tracking Cox’s Bazar since 2017. Searches for Cox’s Bazar, post-2017 increases in ANC coverage and facility-based births, and the 77% figure found no passage addressing those claims. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Lawn, 2014, Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival, Lancet, 18, 189, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Houweling, 2005, Determinants of under-5 mortality among the poor and the rich: a cross-national analysis of 43 developing countries, Int J Epidemiol, 34, 1257, 10.1093/ije/dyi190 · DOI
  3. Houweling, 2010, Socio-economic inequalities in childhood mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a review of the international evidence, Br Med Bull, 93, 7, 10.1093/bmb/ldp048 · DOI
  4. Lawn, 2005, Four million neonatal deaths: when? where? why?, Lancet, 365, 891, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lawn, 2010, 3.6 million neonatal deaths—what is progressing and what is not?, Semin Perinatol, 34, 371, 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.011 · DOI
  6. United Nations, 2015, Sustainable Development Goals, 10.18356/90048b6a-en · DOI
  7. Hollowell, 2011, The effectiveness of antenatal care programs to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: a systematic review, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 11, 13, 10.1186/1471-2393-11-13 · DOI
  8. Ibrahim, 2012, Frequency of antenatal care visits and neonatal mortality in Indonesia, J Trop Pediatr, 58, 184, 10.1093/tropej/fmr067 · DOI
  9. Singh, 2014, Do antenatal care interventions improve neonatal survival in India?, Health Policy Plan, 29, 842, 10.1093/heapol/czt066 · DOI
  10. Dowswell, 2010, Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, CD000934
  11. World Health Organization, 2009, WHO Recommended Interventions for Improving Maternal and Newborn Health
  12. Neupane, 2012, Determinants of time of start of prenatal care and number of prenatal care visits during pregnancy among Nepalese women, J Community Health, 37, 865, 10.1007/s10900-011-9521-0 · DOI
  13. Demographic and Health Survey Measure, 2013, Standard Recode Manual for DHS 6
  14. Cresswell, 2012, Effect of maternal obesity on neonatal death in sub-Saharan Africa: multivariable analysis of 27 national datasets, Lancet, 380, 1325, 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60869-1 · DOI
  15. World Health Organization, 2016, WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience
  16. Mengistu, 2011, Effect of antenatal care on institutional delivery in developing countries: a systematic review, JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep, 9, 1447, 10.11124/01938924-201109350-00001 · DOI
  17. Fink, 2015, Institutional deliveries weakly associated with improved neonatal survival in developing countries: evidence from 192 Demographic and Health Surveys, Int J Epidemiol, 44, 1879, 10.1093/ije/dyv115 · DOI
  18. Finlayson, 2013, Why do women not use antenatal services in low- and middle-income countries? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, PLoS Med, 22, e1001373, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001373 · DOI
  19. Matsuoka, 2010, Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia, Health Policy, 95, 255, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.011 · DOI
  20. Garenne, 1994, Comparison of retrospective surveys with a longitudinal follow-up in Senegal: SFS, DHS and Niakhar, Eur J Popul, 10, 203, 10.1007/BF01265302 · DOI
  21. Macro International Inc. 1993, 1993, An Assessment of the Quality of Health Data in DHS-I Surveys. DHS Methodological reports No.2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Doku, D. T., & Neupane, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Coast (GH)
  • Tampere University (FI)
Corresponding author
Doku, David T
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2017-07-13
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1668-1677
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2771797805
Cited by
117
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Tampereen Yliopisto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
prenatal care, neonatal mortality, low- and middle-income countries, maternal health, neonatal survival, emergency obstetric care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review