Cited by 1Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesProteins in Food SystemsFood and Agricultural Sciences

Effect of food matrix and human gastrointestinal conditions on the in vitro protein hydrolysis of lentil proteins

Open access
Karakaya, Sibel, Hassas, Esra·2025·International Journal of Food Science and Technology

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to evaluate how food matrix, mechanical disintegration, and heat treatment can affect the protein hydrolysis of green lentils during three different in vitro gastrointestinal conditions (infant, late, and early phase adult). The hydrolysed proteins were characterised by sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC/Q-TOF/MS). In all digestion protocols, protein hydrolysis was higher in the lentil protein isolate compared to lentil flour and cooked lentils. Apart from lentil protein isolate, proteolysis was more efficient in the late-phase intestinal digests of cooked lentils compared to digest of lentil flour. Peptides released during digestion were more frequent and had small molecular weights in cooked lentils and protein isolate. Low enzyme activity in infant digestion negatively affected proteolysis. Peptides released from len c 1.010, which is a well-known allergen during in vitro digestion, showed shared motifs with Pru p 3 from Prunus persica, Ara h 9 from Arachis hypogaea, and nonspecific lipid-transfer protein Cor a 8.0101 from Corylus avellana, which are food allergens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ijfood/vvae062

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such dense aggregation structure hinders contact between proteases and protein peptide bonds, reducing hydrolysis efficiency and digestibility of proteins.

    “Such dense aggregation structure hinders the contact between proteases (e.g., pepsin and trypsin) and protein peptide bonds, thereby reducing the hydrolysis efficiency and digestibility of proteins (T. Li, Han, et al. 2025; Ji et al. 2024; Karakaya and Hassas 2025).”

    From Designing Protein Gels for Nutrient Delivery: From Formulation to Digestion (2026) · cites this paper as Karakaya and Hassas 2025

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karakaya, S., & Hassas, E.
Affiliations
Ege University (TR)
Corresponding author
Karakaya, Sibel
Venue
International Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2025-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0950-5423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2621
OpenAlex
W4406232486
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Ege University Scientific Research Coordination Unit (22680)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
lentil protein, proteolysis, in vitro digestion, food matrix, lentil protein isolate, lentil flour, mechanical disintegration, heat treatment (food and biological processing), infant digestion, food allergens, Pru p 3, Ara h 9, lipid transfer proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review