The influence of enrichment devices on development of osteoarthritis in a surgically induced murine model
Open accessAbstract
This study measured the influence of three different environmental enrichment devices (EEDs) on the severity of osteoarthritis (OA) in a surgically induced murine model. The development of OA requires joint movement after surgical instability induced by destabilization of the medial meniscus at 10 weeks of age. We evaluated the hypothesis that animals behavioral activity levels may influence the severity of the disease by investigating the effect of different EEDs on mouse activity and correlating this to OA severity. Thirty male 129S6/SvEvTac mice were housed in groups of five and provided with nesting material and one of three different EEDs: a heavy plastic tube (CPVC), Shepherd Shack (SS), or Tecniplast Mouse House (TMH). We videorecorded the cages throughout the study and constructed an ethogram. Eight weeks after surgery we euthanized the mice and performed a histologic examination of the knees to score the severity of OA based on the different housing systems, correlating the scores with behavioral activity levels for each cage. OA was higher in the mice with CPVC and TMH devices in their cages, whereas the mice with SS devices exhibited less cartilage damage; however, although we observed increased behavioral activity in mice with the CPVC tube and TMH and less in mice with the SS, the statistical results were not significant. The histological results of OA and the ethogram correlated to support our hypothesis that the type of EED plays an indirect role in the severity of the disease by modifying the activity levels of mice. In activity-dependent studies, the impact of an EED needs to be evaluated before change the environment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Environmental enrichment reduces susceptibility to osteoarthritis.
“Environmental enrichment | Reduces anxiety [196,197], stress [196,197], and abnormal repetitive behaviour [198–200]. Reduces susceptibility to epilepsy [201] and osteoarthritis [202] and modifies the pathology of neurological disorders [203]. Increases foraging behaviour in fish [204].”
From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [202]
The Severity of OA section reports lower histological OA scores with one enrichment device, the Shepherd Shack, than with the other devices, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). All mice developed OA after surgery. The paper therefore suggests a device-specific effect on disease severity in a surgically induced mouse model, not a general reduction in susceptibility to developing OA. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Balcombe JP. 2006. Laboratory environments and rodents' behavioral needs: A review. Lab Anim 40:217-235.
- Olsson LA, Dahlborn K. 2002. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: A review of environmental enrichment. Lab Anim 36:243-270.
- Young RJ. 2003. Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Animal Welfare Series. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
Percie du Sert, N., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 · Cited by 2,677 · see citing works
- Authors
- Salvarrey-Strati, A., Watson, L., Blanchet, T., Lu, N., & Glasson, S. S.
- Affiliations
- Wyeth (US)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Salvarrey-Strati, A.
- Venue
- ILAR Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- E23-E30
- ISSN
- 1084-2020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024989753
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- ILAR Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Keywords
- osteoarthritis, environmental enrichment, enrichment devices, surgically induced osteoarthritis, destabilization of the medial meniscus, behavioral activity, ethogram, cartilage damage, housing systems, mouse model, cage design
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Disease Progression, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review