Cited by 14Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

The influence of enrichment devices on development of osteoarthritis in a surgically induced murine model

Open access
Salvarrey-Strati, A., Watson, L., Blanchet, T., Lu, N., Glasson, S. S.·2008·ILAR Journal

Abstract

This study measured the influence of three different environmental enrichment devices (EEDs) on the severity of osteoarthritis (OA) in a surgically induced murine model. The development of OA requires joint movement after surgical instability induced by destabilization of the medial meniscus at 10 weeks of age. We evaluated the hypothesis that animals behavioral activity levels may influence the severity of the disease by investigating the effect of different EEDs on mouse activity and correlating this to OA severity. Thirty male 129S6/SvEvTac mice were housed in groups of five and provided with nesting material and one of three different EEDs: a heavy plastic tube (CPVC), Shepherd Shack (SS), or Tecniplast Mouse House (TMH). We videorecorded the cages throughout the study and constructed an ethogram. Eight weeks after surgery we euthanized the mice and performed a histologic examination of the knees to score the severity of OA based on the different housing systems, correlating the scores with behavioral activity levels for each cage. OA was higher in the mice with CPVC and TMH devices in their cages, whereas the mice with SS devices exhibited less cartilage damage; however, although we observed increased behavioral activity in mice with the CPVC tube and TMH and less in mice with the SS, the statistical results were not significant. The histological results of OA and the ethogram correlated to support our hypothesis that the type of EED plays an indirect role in the severity of the disease by modifying the activity levels of mice. In activity-dependent studies, the impact of an EED needs to be evaluated before change the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ilar.49.3.e23

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Environmental enrichment reduces susceptibility to osteoarthritis.

    “Environmental enrichment | Reduces anxiety [196,197], stress [196,197], and abnormal repetitive behaviour [198–200]. Reduces susceptibility to epilepsy [201] and osteoarthritis [202] and modifies the pathology of neurological disorders [203]. Increases foraging behaviour in fish [204].”

    From Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (2020) · cites this paper as [202]

    The Severity of OA section reports lower histological OA scores with one enrichment device, the Shepherd Shack, than with the other devices, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). All mice developed OA after surgery. The paper therefore suggests a device-specific effect on disease severity in a surgically induced mouse model, not a general reduction in susceptibility to developing OA. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Balcombe JP. 2006. Laboratory environments and rodents' behavioral needs: A review. Lab Anim 40:217-235.
  2. Olsson LA, Dahlborn K. 2002. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: A review of environmental enrichment. Lab Anim 36:243-270.
  3. Young RJ. 2003. Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Animal Welfare Series. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salvarrey-Strati, A., Watson, L., Blanchet, T., Lu, N., & Glasson, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Wyeth (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Salvarrey-Strati, A.
Venue
ILAR Journal
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
E23-E30
ISSN
1084-2020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024989753
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ILAR Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Keywords
osteoarthritis, environmental enrichment, enrichment devices, surgically induced osteoarthritis, destabilization of the medial meniscus, behavioral activity, ethogram, cartilage damage, housing systems, mouse model, cage design
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Disease Progression, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review