Cited by 35Animal testing and alternativesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Animal husbandry and experimental design

Nevalainen, T.·2014·ILAR Journal

Abstract

If the scientist needs to contact the animal facility after any study to inquire about husbandry details, this represents a lost opportunity, which can ultimately interfere with the study results and their interpretation. There is a clear tendency for authors to describe methodological procedures down to the smallest detail, but at the same time to provide minimal information on animals and their husbandry. Controlling all major variables as far as possible is the key issue when establishing an experimental design. The other common mechanism affecting study results is a change in the variation. Factors causing bias or variation changes are also detectable within husbandry. Our lives and the lives of animals are governed by cycles: the seasons, the reproductive cycle, the weekend-working days, the cage change/room sanitation cycle, and the diurnal rhythm. Some of these may be attributable to routine husbandry, and the rest are cycles, which may be affected by husbandry procedures. Other issues to be considered are consequences of in-house transport, restrictions caused by caging, randomization of cage location, the physical environment inside the cage, the acoustic environment audible to animals, olfactory environment, materials in the cage, cage complexity, feeding regimens, kinship, and humans. Laboratory animal husbandry issues are an integral but underappreciated part of investigators' experimental design, which if ignored can cause major interference with the results. All…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ilar/ilu035

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The environment determines the health and wellbeing of the animals, and every aspect of it can potentially affect their behavioural and physiological responses, thereby affecting research outcomes.

    “The environment determines the health and wellbeing of the animals, and every aspect of it can potentially affect their behavioural and physiological responses, thereby affecting research outcomes [175].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nevalainen, T.
Corresponding author
Nevalainen, T.
Venue
ILAR Journal
Published
2014-12-20
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
392-398
ISSN
1084-2020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970014815
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ILAR Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
laboratory animal husbandry, experimental design, bias, circadian rhythm, seasonal variation, cage environment, feeding regimen, kinship
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Animal Welfare, Circadian Rhythm, Housing, Animal, Research Design, Animal Experimentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review