The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Scrapie and Transmissible Mink Encephalopathy in Hamsters. II. Clinical Signs, Pathology, and Pathogenesis
Abstract
Scrapie and transmissible mink encephalopathy were studied in hamsters; clinical signs, pathology, and the replication of the agents of each disease in brain and spleen were compared. The most noticeable clinical sign in scrapie-affected hamsters was a distinct cerebellar ataxia beginning 16 weeks after inoculation. Ataxia was not prominent in animals affected with transmissible mink encephalopathy; these animals gradually became more and more lethargic. The pathology in the central nervous system in both diseases consisted of astrocytic hypertrophy, microvacuolation of the neuropil, and neuronal degeneration. The scrapie agent appeared to have a greater effect on nuclear masses, especially those present in brain stem and the central white matter of the cerebellum. The earliest lesions in both diseases were detected near pia arachnoid surfaces and adjacent to the ventricular system. These initial sites of involvement suggest that the cerebrospinal fluid may be an important route by which inocula are disseminated to susceptible cells after intracerebral inoculation. Both agents multiplied rapidly in brain, reaching titers greater than 10-8 ld-50/0.05 ml before the onset of clinical signs. Titers in spleen were 4-6 logs lower than titers in brain at every point measured during the asymptomatic or clinical course of disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prusiner, S. B. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363 · Cited by 5,373
Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and the aetiology of 'new variant' CJD
Collinge, J., Sidle, K. C. L., Meads, J., Ironside, J., & Hill, A. F. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383685a0 · Cited by 1,735
Scrapie and cellular PrP isoforms are encoded by the same chromosomal gene
Basler, K., Oesch, B., Scott, M., Westaway, D., Wälchli, M., Groth, D. F., McKinley, M. P., Prusiner, S. B., & Weissmann, C. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90662-8 · Cited by 835
Unconventional Viruses and the Origin and Disappearance of Kuru
Gajdusek, D. C. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.142303 · Cited by 671
Kimberlin, R. H., Collis, S. C., & Walker, C. A. (1976) · Journal of Comparative Pathology · doi:10.1016/0021-9975(76)90038-4 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, R. F., & Kimberlin, R. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1975-02-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-110
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2070206977
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Scrapie and Transmissible Mink Encephalopathy in Hamsters. II. Clinical Signs, Pathology, and Pathogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/131.2.104
- The paper
- Marsh, R. F., & Kimberlin, R. H. (1975). Comparison of Scrapie and Transmissible Mink Encephalopathy in Hamsters. II. Clinical Signs, Pathology, and Pathogenesis. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/131.2.104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.