The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Bacteriology of the Vaginal Flora
Abstract
Quantitative bacteriology was performed on vaginal secretions from healthy adult women. The analysis included a single sample from 17 college students and 35 samples from five volunteers collected at intervals of three to five days throughout the menstrual cycle. Mean concentrations in all 52 specimens were 10(8.1) aerobic bacteria/g and 10(9.1) anaerobic bacteria/g. The rank of predominant organisms, according to rates of recovery in concentrations of greater than 10(5) colony-forming units/g, was anaerobic and facultative Lacrobacillus species, Peptococcus species, Bacteroides species, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Corynebacterium species, Peotostreptococcus species, and Eubacterium species. Sequential samples collected throughout the menstrual cycle showed relatively consistent mean levels of anaerobes and a significant decrease in concentrations of aerobes in premenstrual specimens compared with those in the specimens collected in the week following onset of menses. Analysis of sequential specimens from each of the five individuals showed considerable variation in species recovered. These data indicate that the vaginal flora in healthy adult women is a dynamic ecosystem in which anaerobes are usually the numerically dominant bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boskey, E. R., Telsch, K. M., Whaley, K. J., Moench, T. R., & Cone, R. A. (1999) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.67.10.5170-5175.1999 · Cited by 373
Murdoch, D. A. (1998) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.11.1.81 · Cited by 339
Menopause and the vaginal microbiome
Muhleisen, A. L., & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. (2016) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.05.015 · Cited by 328
Lin, W.-C., Chang, C. Y.-Y., Hsu, Y.-A., Chiang, J.-H., & Wan, L. (2016) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000002773 · Cited by 70
Joseph, R. J., Ser, H.-L., Kuai, Y.-H., Tan, L. T.-H., Arasoo, V. J. T., Letchumanan, V., Wang, L., Pusparajah, P., Goh, B.-H., Ab Mutalib, N.-S., et al. (2021) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics10060719 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartlett, J. G., Onderdonk, A. B., Drude, E., Goldstein, C., Anderka, M., Alpert, S., & McCormack, W. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1977-08-01
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 271-277
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2101099022
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Bacteriology of the Vaginal Flora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/136.2.271
- The paper
- Bartlett, J. G., Onderdonk, A. B., Drude, E., Goldstein, C., Anderka, M., Alpert, S., & McCormack, W. M. (1977). Quantitative Bacteriology of the Vaginal Flora. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/136.2.271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.