The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts: Importance of Slime Production, Species Identification, and Shunt Removal to Clinical Outcome
Abstract
We collected and characterized 85 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci (51 pathogens and 34 contaminants) from cerebrospinal fluid shunts. All isolates were classified by species and characterized by antimicrobial susceptibility and quantitative adherence to plastic tissue culture plates. There were more adherent organisms among pathogens than among contaminants (P less than .01). Species distribution was similar for both groups; however, 20% of the pathogens and none of the contaminants were phosphatase-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis (P less than .05). Resistance to four or more antimicrobial agents was detected in 45% of both groups. Neither species designation nor antimicrobial resistance correlated with clinical outcome. Five (83%) of six infections due to nonadherent (vs. 16 [41%] of 39 due to adherent; P less than .05) coagulase-negative staphylococci were, however, cured with antimicrobial therapy alone. Cure was highly associated with removal of the colonized shunt--38% of infected patients treated with antimicrobial therapy alone were cured, 75% treated with antimicrobial therapy and partial shunt removal were cured, and all treated with antimicrobial therapy and total shunt replacement were cured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marrie, T. J., & Costerton, J. W. (1984) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.19.5.687-693.1984 · Cited by 327 · cited 1×
“with a variety of in vitro, in vivo, and epidemiological studies regarding coagulase-negative staphylococci and intravascular catheters [6,19-24], peritoneal dialysis catheters [25,26], and pacemakers [Z7, 28].”
Background
Cited by
Anderl, J. N., Franklin, M. J., & Stewart, P. S. (2000) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.44.7.1818-1824.2000 · Cited by 958
Mack, D., Fischer, W., Krokotsch, A., Leopold, K., Hartmann, R., Egge, H., & Laufs, R. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.1.175-183.1996 · Cited by 885
Herrmann, M., Vaudaux, P. E., Pittet, D., Auckenthaler, R., Lew, P. D., Perdreau, F. S., Peters, G., & Waldvogel, F. A. (1988) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/158.4.693 · Cited by 522
Mack, D., Nedelmann, M., Krokotsch, A., Schwarzkopf, A., Heesemann, J., & Laufs, R. (1994) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.62.8.3244-3253.1994 · Cited by 344
Rohde, H., Frankenberger, S., Zähringer, U., & Mack, D. (2010) · European Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.10.005 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Younger, J. J., Christensen, G. D., Bartleyt, D. L., Simmons, J. C. H., & Barrett, F. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-10-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 548-554
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2053173345
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts: Importance of Slime Production, Species Identification, and Shunt Removal to Clinical Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/156.4.548
- The paper
- Younger, J. J., Christensen, G. D., Bartleyt, D. L., Simmons, J. C. H., & Barrett, F. F. (1987). Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts: Importance of Slime Production, Species Identification, and Shunt Removal to Clinical Outcome. Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/156.4.548
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.