Cited by 25Parasitic Infections and DiagnosticsAmoebic Infections and TreatmentsReproductive tract infections research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mebendazole in Giardial Infection: A Comparative Study with Metronidazole

Dawood, N. S., AI-Waili, Hasan, N. U.·1992·Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Noori S. Dawood, AI-Waili, Noori U. Hasan; Mebendazole in Giardial Infection: A Comparative Study with Metronidazole, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/165.6.1170

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dawood, N. S., AI-Waili, & Hasan, N. U.
Venue
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
1992-06-01
Volume
165
Issue
6
Pages
1170-1171
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2328795431
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Amoebic Infections and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
mebendazole, metronidazole, giardiasis, Giardia lamblia, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Giardiasis, Humans, Male, Mebendazole, Metronidazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review