The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of Plasmodium vivax by Polymerase Chain Reaction in a Field Study
Abstract
Detection and typing of Plasmodium vivax by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was evaluated in a prospective blinded comparative field study in Thailand. PCR amplification of the circumsporozoite (CS) gene was compared with microscopy for the detection of P. vivax in blood samples from 174 Thai Rangers and 50 malaria-free Bangkok residents. For PCR analysis, filter paper specimens collected by finger prick were randomly processed and blindly interpreted for the presence of the CS gene of P. vivax. The VK210 and VK247 CS variants of P. vivax were detected by specific fluorescein or radiolabeled oligoprobes. Autoradiography with 32P-labeled probes and enhanced chemoluminescent detection with fluorescein-labeled probes identified 91% and 96%, respectively, of 119 microscopically confirmed infections; both systems detected < 100 parasites/microL. Compared with microscopy, the specificity of PCR and radiometric or enhanced chemoluminescent detection was 96% and 90%, respectively. The ease of collection and transport of filter-paper specimens combined with the sensitive and specific detection of allelic genes of P. vivax by PCR suggests that this method may prove to be a valuable tool for epidemiologic and heterogeneity studies of P. vivax.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, most published PCR assays are gel based with (4, 5, 15) or without (2, 3, 9, 23, 25-27, 29, 31, 35, 36) subsequent probe hybridizations”
From Real-Time PCR for Detection and Identification of Plasmodium spp (2005) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Real-Time PCR for Detection and Identification of Plasmodium spp
Mangold, K. A., Manson, R. U., Koay, E. S. C., Stephens, L., Regner, M., Thomson, R. B., Peterson, L. R., & Kaul, K. L. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.43.5.2435-2440.2005 · Cited by 278
New strategies for the diagnosis and screening of malaria
Lee, S., Kara, U., Koay, E., Lee, M., Lam, S., & Teo, D. (2002) · International Journal of Hematology · doi:10.1007/bf03165265 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Kain, K. C., Brown, A. E., Mirabelli, L., & Webster, H. K.
- Corresponding author
- Kain, K. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-11-01
- Volume
- 168
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1323-1326
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W4237946864
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Bird parasitology and diseases
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
- Keywords
- Plasmodium vivax, malaria diagnosis, microscopy comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review