The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Field Effectiveness of Live Attenuated Measles-Containing Vaccines: A Review of Published Literature
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Information on measles vaccine effectiveness (VE) is critical to help inform policies for future global measles control goals. METHODS: We reviewed results of VE studies published during 1960-2010. RESULTS: Seventy papers with 135 VE point estimates were identified. For a single dose of vaccine administered at 9-11 months of age and ≥12 months, the median VE was 77.0% (interquartile range [IQR], 62%-91%) and 92.0% (IQR, 86%-96%), respectively. When analysis was restricted to include only point estimates for which vaccination history was verified and cases were laboratory confirmed, the median VE was 84.0% (IQR, 72.0%-95.0%) and 92.5% (IQR, 84.8%-97.0%) when vaccine was received at 9-11 and ≥12 months, respectively. Published VE vary by World Health Organization region, with generally lower estimates in countries belonging to the African and SouthEast Asian Regions. For 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine, compared with no vaccination, the median VE was 94.1% (IQR, 88.3%-98.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The VE of the first dose of measles-containing vaccine administered at 9-11 months was lower than what would be expected from serologic evaluations but was higher than expected when administered at ≥12 months. The median VE increased in a subset of articles in which classification bias was reduced through verified vaccination history and laboratory confirmation. In general, 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine provided excellent protection against measles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marin, M., Nguyen, H. Q., Langidrik, J. R., Edwards, R., Briand, K., Papania, M. J., Seward, J. F., & LeBaron, C. W. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/498902 · Cited by 91
Cited by
McGovern, M. E., & Canning, D. (2015) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwv125 · Cited by 122
Immunization Coverage in Migrant School Children Along the Thailand-Myanmar Border
Kaji, A., Parker, D. M., Chu, C. S., Thayatkawin, W., Suelaor, J., Charatrueangrongkun, R., Salathibuppha, K., Nosten, F. H., & McGready, R. (2016) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-015-0294-x · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Uzicanin, A., & Zimmerman, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- S133-S149
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2145173057
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field Effectiveness of Live Attenuated Measles-Containing Vaccines: A Review of Published Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/infdis/jir102
- The paper
- Uzicanin, A., & Zimmerman, L. (2011). Field Effectiveness of Live Attenuated Measles-Containing Vaccines: A Review of Published Literature. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.