Cited by 78Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyData-Driven Disease SurveillanceViral Infections and Immunology Research

Improving Polio Vaccination Coverage in Nigeria Through the Use of Geographic Information System Technology

Barau, Inuwa, Zubairu, Mahmud, Mwanza, Michael N., Seaman, Vincent Y.·2014·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Historically, microplanning for polio vaccination campaigns in Nigeria relied on inaccurate and incomplete hand-drawn maps, resulting in the exclusion of entire settlements and missed children. The goal of this work was to create accurate, coordinate-based maps for 8 polio-endemic states in northern Nigeria to improve microplanning and support tracking of vaccination teams, thereby enhancing coverage, supervision, and accountability. METHODS: Settlement features were identified in the target states, using high-resolution satellite imagery. Field teams collected names and geocoordinates for each settlement feature, with the help of local guides. Global position system (GPS) tracking of vaccination teams was conducted in selected areas and daily feedback provided to supervisors. RESULTS: Geographic information system (GIS)-based maps were created for 2238 wards in the 8 target states. The resulting microplans included all settlements and more-efficient team assignments, owing to the improved spatial reference. GPS tracking was conducted in 111 high-risk local government areas, resulting in improved team performance and the identification of missed/poorly covered settlements. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate and complete maps are a necessary part of an effective polio microplan, and tracking vaccinators gives supervisors a tool to ensure that all settlements are visited.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jiu010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barau, I., Zubairu, M., Mwanza, M. N., & Seaman, V. Y.
Affiliations
  • National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NG)
  • World Health Organization - Nigeria (NG)
  • Gates Foundation (US)
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2014-11
Volume
210
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
S102-S110
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2005744645
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Baoji University of Arts And Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
Keywords
polio vaccination, vaccination coverage, microplanning, geographic information systems, settlement mapping, Northern Nigeria
MeSH terms
Humans, Nigeria, Poliomyelitis, Vaccination, Poliovirus Vaccines, Geographic Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review