Improving Polio Vaccination Coverage in Nigeria Through the Use of Geographic Information System Technology
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Historically, microplanning for polio vaccination campaigns in Nigeria relied on inaccurate and incomplete hand-drawn maps, resulting in the exclusion of entire settlements and missed children. The goal of this work was to create accurate, coordinate-based maps for 8 polio-endemic states in northern Nigeria to improve microplanning and support tracking of vaccination teams, thereby enhancing coverage, supervision, and accountability. METHODS: Settlement features were identified in the target states, using high-resolution satellite imagery. Field teams collected names and geocoordinates for each settlement feature, with the help of local guides. Global position system (GPS) tracking of vaccination teams was conducted in selected areas and daily feedback provided to supervisors. RESULTS: Geographic information system (GIS)-based maps were created for 2238 wards in the 8 target states. The resulting microplans included all settlements and more-efficient team assignments, owing to the improved spatial reference. GPS tracking was conducted in 111 high-risk local government areas, resulting in improved team performance and the identification of missed/poorly covered settlements. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate and complete maps are a necessary part of an effective polio microplan, and tracking vaccinators gives supervisors a tool to ensure that all settlements are visited.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zaidi, S., Shaikh, S. A., Sayani, S., Kazi, A. M., Khoja, A., Hussain, S. S., & Najmi, R. (2020) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/16081 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barau, I., Zubairu, M., Mwanza, M. N., & Seaman, V. Y.
- Affiliations
- National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NG)
- World Health Organization - Nigeria (NG)
- Gates Foundation (US)
- ORCID
- Seaman, Vincent Y.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- S102-S110
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2005744645
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Baoji University of Arts And Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
- Keywords
- polio vaccination, vaccination coverage, microplanning, geographic information systems, settlement mapping, Northern Nigeria
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Nigeria, Poliomyelitis, Vaccination, Poliovirus Vaccines, Geographic Information Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review