A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives
Abstract
Over the last few years there has been increasing interest in conceptualizing disease aetiology within a life course framework.1,2 This approach is not new to Public Health or unique to epidemiology (see below). However, its current resonance and interest within epidemiology reflects the challenging theoretical framework this approach provides. This issue of the International Journal of Epidemiology has several papers with a ‘life course theme’. This accompanying editorial is intended to highlight what we believe are the key conceptual issues around life course epidemiology. We have chosen to use examples from chronic disease epidemiology, but this approach is also applicable within the context of infectious diseases3 and wider notions of health and wellbeing.4 We have defined a life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology1 as the study of long-term effects on chronic disease risk of physical and social exposures during gestation, childhood, adolescence, young adulthood and later adult life. It includes studies of the biological, behavioural and psychosocial pathways that operate across an individual's life course, as well as across generations, to influence the development of chronic diseases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chronic diseases usually emerge over many decades because of long latency after initial risk exposures.
“At the same time, the emergence of chronic diseases usually takes many decades due to the long latency after the initial risk exposures (29).”
From Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span (2016) · cites this paper as [29]
LCP considers psychosocial mediators in the biological programing of health and is therefore a major hub for recycling predictors of health outcomes in Figure 1.
“LCP considers psychosocial mediators in the biological programing of health (219) and is therefore a major hub for recycling predictors of health outcomes in Figure 1.”
From A Biopsychosocial Overview of the Opioid Crisis: Considering Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Health (2019) · cites this paper as [219]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 110 · Cited by 3,038
- Authors
- Ben-Shlomo, Y.
- Venue
- International Journal of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 285-293
- ISSN
- 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3685
- OpenAlex
- W2123828906
- Cited by
- 3,038
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 179 · 2025: 146 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 175 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 172 · 2015: 176 · 2014: 149 · 2013: 132 · 2012: 120
- FWCI
- 56.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Social Fund
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
- Keywords
- life course epidemiology, chronic disease, etiology, prenatal exposure, children's exposure, adolescence, early adulthood, psychosocial pathways, biological pathways, intergenerational effects, conceptual model
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Epidemiologic Methods, Health Status, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Sociology, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review