The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a national performance indicator framework for the Dutch health system
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To report on the first phase of the development of a national performance indicator framework for the Dutch health system. METHODS: In January 2002, we initiated an informed interactive process with the intended users-policymakers at the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport-and academics to develop both the conceptual framework and its content. Decisions were based on consensus after discussing strategic goals of the health system, information needs of policy makers at the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, and studying existing theory and international experiences with national performance indicator frameworks. We identified objectives and criteria for a framework at the national level, constructed a conceptual model, and selected indicator areas. RESULTS: As a starting point we chose a balanced scorecard reflecting four perspectives towards health system management information at the national level. These perspectives are consumer orientation, finances, delivery of high quality care, and the ability to learn and grow. We then linked the Lalonde model for population health to a balanced scorecard model. The constructed model makes the relationship between population health and health system management apparent, and facilitates the presentation of performance information from various perspectives. The model reflects the strategic goals of the Dutch health system, i.e. contributing to the production of health by providing necessary health care of good quality that is accessible for all Dutch citizens while simultaneously informing policy makers about the performance of the entire health system in all sectors (care, cure, prevention, and social services). The selected indicator areas for health system management information (20 in total) reflect the policy and management functions of the government and the defined public goals of the health system. The model was formally adopted by the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport in February 2003, and since then individual indicator areas have been operationalized by 30 representatives of various departments at the Ministry with continuous external research support. CONCLUSION: The merit of linking the balanced scorecard inspired model to public health data is that it facilitates the visualization of the contribution of the health system to the improvement of population health. The method of an intensive interactive indicator development process between policy makers and researchers has so far proven successful.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In other cases, participative case studies [50] and action research [63,64] contribute to developing a BSC.”
From The Evolution of Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Its Design, Implementation, Use, and Review (2022) · cites this paper as [63]
In the citing paper
“However, although the financial perspective remains prevalent over the years, the process-related perspective is rapidly increasing in the number of published papers that analyze it [39,63,66].”
From The Evolution of Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Its Design, Implementation, Use, and Review (2022) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
The balanced scorecard : measures that drive performance
Caplan, R. S. (1992) · Harvard business review · Cited by 12,085
The world health report 2000 - Health systems: improving performance
Reinhardt, U., & Cheng, T.-M. (2000) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.1590/s0042-96862000000800020 · Cited by 3,218
Kindig, D., & Stoddart, G. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.3.380 · Cited by 1,046
Producing Health, Consuming Health Care
Evans, R. G., & Stoddart, G. L. (2017) · Why are Some People Healthy and Others Not? · doi:10.4324/9781315135755-3 · Cited by 486
Arah, O. A. (2003) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg049 · Cited by 339
The changing global context of public health
McMichael, A., & Beaglehole, R. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02564-2 · Cited by 271
Applying the Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare Provider Organizations
Inamdar, N., & Kaplan, R. S. (2002) · Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.1097/00115514-200205000-00008 · Cited by 265
On Being a Good Listener: Setting Priorities for Applied Health Services Research
Lomas, J., Fulop, N., GAGNON, D., & Allen, P. W. (2003) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060 · Cited by 154
Performance Management In British Health Care: Will It Deliver?
SMITH, P. C. (2002) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.103 · Cited by 108
Klazinga, N. (2001) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/13.6.433 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Edward, A., Kumar, B., Kakar, F., Salehi, A. S., Burnham, G., & Peters, D. H. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001066 · Cited by 119
Balanced scorecard-based performance evaluation of Chinese county hospitals in underdeveloped areas
Gao, H., Chen, H., Feng, J., Qin, X., Wang, X., Liang, S., Zhao, J., & Feng, Q. (2018) · Journal of International Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0300060518757606 · Cited by 53
Betto, F., Sardi, A., Garengo, P., & Sorano, E. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191610291 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- ten Asbroek, A. H. A.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- ten Asbroek, A. H. A.
- Venue
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- i65-i71
- ISSN
- 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3677
- OpenAlex
- W2096570249
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.nivel.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- health system performance, balanced scorecard, population health, health policy, indicator development, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Information Services, Netherlands, Program Development, Quality Indicators, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.