Cited by 91Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Nurses’ and nursing assistants’ perceptions of patient safety culture in nursing homes

Hughes, Carmel M., Lapane, Kate L.·2006·International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether perceptions of patient safety in nursing homes vary by length of employment, type of employee, and shift worked. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Twenty-six nursing homes in Ohio participating in a randomized trial to test the effectiveness of a clinical informatics tool to improve patient safety during the medication monitoring. PARTICIPANTS: Nurses (n = 367) and nursing assistants (n = 636) employed at the time of the survey in the summer and fall of 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Resident safety questions included 34 items on different aspects of resident safety (overall safety perception, teamwork within and between departments, communication openness, feedback and communication about error, non-punitive response to error, organizational learning, management expectations, and actions promoting safety, staffing, and management support for patient safety). RESULTS: Overall perceptions of resident safety by employees were acceptable, with clear management communication of safety goals. Approximately 40% of nursing staff found it difficult to make changes to improve things most or all of the time; similar proportions indicated that management seriously considered staff suggestions to improve resident safety; only half reported management discussions with staff to prevent recurrence of mistakes. Regardless of staff type, one in five reported feeling punished and two in five reported that reporting of errors was seen as a 'personal attack'. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to change the safety culture in nursing homes are warranted. Nursing homes need guidance on how to use information to implement safety improvement projects in the context of a strict regulatory environment which may prohibit innovative system change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/intqhc/mzl020

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, C. M., & Lapane, K. L.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Carmel M.
Venue
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Published
2006-07-19
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
281-286
ISSN
  • 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3677
OpenAlex
W2120786602
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal for Quality in Health Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
patient safety culture, nursing homes, nurses, nursing assistants, safety climate, error reporting, non-punitive response to error, organizational learning, teamwork, open communication, management support, therapeutic drug monitoring, clinical informatics, regulatory environment
MeSH terms
Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Male, Nurses, Nursing Assistants, Nursing Homes, Ohio, Safety, Organizational Culture, Safety Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review