The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is known about adverse events in older medical hospital inpatients? A systematic review of the literature
Abstract
PURPOSE: Large international studies have shown that older hospital inpatients are at particular risk of adverse events. The purpose of this review was to synthesize data from studies designed to assess the scale and nature of this harm, with the ultimate aim of informing the development of new safety and quality measurement tools to facilitate improved hospital care for these vulnerable patients. DATA SOURCES STUDY SELECTION: and data extraction A systematic search using Ovid SP and other sources was carried out, rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and quality assessment of included studies was conducted. Data were synthesized to give a picture of the incidence, types, causes, preventability and outcomes of adverse events in older medical inpatients. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Nine relevant studies were identified. A wide range of adverse event incidences were reported, from 5.29 to 6.2% in re-analyses of large adverse event studies, to 60% in studies in which the development of 'geriatric syndromes' (e.g. falls, delirium, incontinence) was also considered to be adverse events. Important causative factors other than age included clinical complexity, co-morbidity, illness severity, reduced functional ability and lower quality of care. Adverse events in older people lead to unnecessary interventions with resultant complications and increased length of stay. CONCLUSION: More work is needed to understand the complex nature of adverse events in older inpatients. We must tailor safety measurement and improvement strategies to address challenges presented by the complexity of the geriatric syndromes and the processes of care encountered by older inpatients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grey matter: ageing in developing countries
Shetty, P. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60541-8 · Cited by 224 · cited 1×
“The picture is similar across the world, and consequently we need to focus on improving the management of conditions associated with old age, such as frailty and dementia [6], and to improve the safety and quality of hospital care of all patients with these conditions.”
Background
Cited by
Panagioti, M., Khan, K., Keers, R. N., Abuzour, A., Phipps, D., Kontopantelis, E., Bower, P., Campbell, S., Haneef, R., Avery, A. J., et al. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l4185 · Cited by 874
Turner, G., & Clegg, A. (2014) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afu138 · Cited by 678
A systematic review of the effectiveness and roles of advanced practice nursing in older people
Morilla-Herrera, J. C., Garcia-Mayor, S., Martín-Santos, F. J., Kaknani Uttumchandani, S., Leon Campos, Á., Caro Bautista, J., & Morales-Asencio, J. M. (2016) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.010 · Cited by 131
Parke, B., & Hunter, K. F. (2017) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/0840470416664532 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, S. J., Brown, K. F., Ames, D., & Vincent, C.
- Venue
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-08-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 542-554
- ISSN
- 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3677
- OpenAlex
- W2131348582
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is known about adverse events in older medical hospital inpatients? A systematic review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/intqhc/mzt056
- The paper
- Long, S. J., Brown, K. F., Ames, D., & Vincent, C. (2013). What is known about adverse events in older medical hospital inpatients? A systematic review of the literature. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.