The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the extent of objective 'non-beneficial treatments (NBTs)' (too much) anytime in the last 6 months of life in routine hospital care. DATA SOURCES: English language publications in Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and the grey literature (January 1995-April 2015). STUDY SELECTION: All study types assessing objective dimensions of non-beneficial medical or surgical diagnostic, therapeutic or non-palliative procedures administered to older adults at the end of life (EOL). DATA EXTRACTION: A 13-item quality score estimated independently by two authors. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence from 38 studies indicates that on average 33-38% of patients near the EOL received NBTs. Mean prevalence of resuscitation attempts for advanced stage patients was 28% (range 11-90%). Mean death in intensive care unit (ICU) was 42% (range 11-90%); and mean death rate in a hospital ward was 44.5% (range 29-60%). Mean prevalence of active measures including dialysis, radiotherapy, transfusions and life support treatment to terminal patient was 7-77% (mean 30%). Non-beneficial administration of antibiotics, cardiovascular, digestive and endocrine treatments to dying patients occurred in 11-75% (mean 38%). Non-beneficial tests were performed on 33-50% of patients with do-not-resuscitate orders. From meta-analyses, the pooled prevalence of non-beneficial ICU admission was 10% (95% CI 0-33%); for chemotherapy in the last six weeks of life was 33% (95% CI 24-41%). CONCLUSION: This review has confirmed widespread use of NBTs at the EOL in acute hospitals. While a certain level of NBT is inevitable, its extent, variation and justification need further scrutiny.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Slim, K., Nini, E., Forestier, D., Kwiatkowski, F., Panis, Y., & Chipponi, J. (2003) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x · Cited by 7,603
Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study*
Angus, D. C., Barnato, A. E., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., Weissfeld, L. A., Watson, R. S., Rickert, T., & Rubenfeld, G. D. (2004) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000114816.62331.08 · Cited by 1,155
Aggressiveness of Cancer Care Near the End of Life: Is It a Quality-of-Care Issue?
Earle, C. C., Landrum, M. B., Souza, J. M., Neville, B. A., Weeks, J. C., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.15.8253 · Cited by 949
Use of Statins and the Risk of Death in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Yu, O., Eberg, M., Benayoun, S., Aprikian, A., Batist, G., Suissa, S., & Azoulay, L. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.49.4757 · Cited by 659
Schnipper, L. E., Smith, T. J., Raghavan, D., Blayney, D. W., Ganz, P. A., Mulvey, T. M., & Wollins, D. S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.42.8375 · Cited by 649
Ahmed, I., Sutton, A. J., & Riley, R. D. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d7762 · Cited by 404
Piers, R. D. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1888 · Cited by 365
(2015) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzv004 · Cited by 353
Cited by
Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: Bringing death back into life
Sallnow, L., Smith, R., Ahmedzai, S. H., Bhadelia, A., Chamberlain, C., Cong, Y., Doble, B., Dullie, L., Durie, R., Finkelstein, E. A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02314-x · Cited by 807
Should artificial intelligence augment medical decision making? The case for an autonomy algorithm
(2018) · AMA Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2018.902 · Cited by 78
Lightbody, C. J., Campbell, J. N., Herbison, G. P., Osborne, H. K., Radley, A., & Taylor, D. R. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024264 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Cardona-Morrell, M., Kim, J., Turner, R., Anstey, M., Mitchell, I., & Hillman, K.
- Venue
- International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 456-469
- ISSN
- 1353-4505 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3677
- OpenAlex
- W2471761637
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/intqhc/mzw060
- The paper
- Cardona-Morrell, M., Kim, J., Turner, R., Anstey, M., Mitchell, I., & Hillman, K. (2016). Non-beneficial treatments in hospital at the end of life: a systematic review on extent of the problem. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzw060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.