The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Embarrassing Superstition, Doctrine, and the Study of New Religious Movements
Abstract
Jamie Hubbard; Embarrassing Superstition, Doctrine, and the Study of New Religious Movements1, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Volume 66, Issue 1,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, such doctrinal repositionings based on iconographic reconfigurations demonstrate not only the need for considering doctrinal matters within new religions as Hubbard (1998) has argued, but also the need for attending to imagery and the imagination as a window unto such doctrinal matters as well.”
From Shinnyo-En and the Formulation of a New Esoteric Iconography (2019) · cites this paper as Hubbard (1998)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shinnyo-En and the Formulation of a New Esoteric Iconography
Winfield, P. D. (2019) · Material Religion · doi:10.1080/17432200.2019.1568756 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hubbard, J.
- Affiliations
- Smith College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hubbard, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Religion
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-92
- ISSN
- 0002-7189 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4585
- OpenAlex
- W2323885941
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Religion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Keywords
- superstition, religious doctrine, new religious movements, embarrassment, religious studies methodology, epistemology of religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
