The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“It’s a Lie. There’s No Truth in It! It’s a Sin!”: On the Limits of the Humanistic Study of Religion and the Costs of Saving Others from Themselves
Abstract
Juxtaposing two recent texts that each address the scholar’s role when it comes to issues of difference, this essay investigates how members of our field’s dominant liberal humanistic tradition address potentially competing systems of representation. After comparing the recent work of Robert Orsi with that of Paul Courtright, the essay concludes that, when it comes to those Others whose differences can easily be tolerated or overlooked with little or no cost, scholars in this tradition deploy a different sets of tools than when their work focuses on Others for whom they feel little affinity and whose interests conflict with their own. Failing to understand all scholarship as necessarily involved in acts of translation and redescription—acts that are all equally removed from some posited authentic source—the essay ends by suggesting that we risk the future of our field when we employ different methods for different people, all based on the degree of our personal identification with our subject matter. How many things have to happen to you before something occurs to you? —Robert Frost1
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chōgen's 1185 vow clearly states that Chōgen 'crossed over to the distant Song Country, journeyed to Wutai, and paid reverence to Mañjuśrī's auspicious light.'
“But the vow clearly states that Ch ō gen ' crossed over to the distant Song Country, journeyed to Wutai, and paid reverence to Mañju ś r ī ' s auspicious light. ' 52”
From Moving monks and mountains: Chōgen and the cults of Gyōki, Mañjuśrī, and Wutai (2019) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Bayart, Jean-François [1996] 2005The Illusions of Cultural Identity. Trans. by Steven Randall et al. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Borges, Jorge Louis [1989] 1999Collected Fictions. Trans. by Andrew Hurley. New York: Penguin.
- Cabezón, José Ignacio 2006 “The Discipline and Its Others: The Dialectic of Alterity in the Study of Religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion74/1: 21–38. · DOI
- Colas, Dominique [1992] 1997Civil Society and Fanaticism: Conjoined Histories. Trans. by Amy Jacobs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Courtright, Paul B. 1985 Ganeśa: Lord of Obstacles, Lord of Beginnings. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Covington, Dennis 1995 Salvation on Sand Mountain: Snake Handling and Redemption in Southern Appalachia. New York: Penguin.
- Dalrymple, William 2005 “India: The War Over History.” New York Review of Books52/6 (April7): 62–65.
- Eliade, Mircea [1969] 1984 “A New Humanism.” In The Quest: History and Meaning in Religion, 1–11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
- [1954] 1990Yoga: Immortality and Freedom. Trans. by Willard R. Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Godlove, Terry 1994 “Religious Discourse and First Person Authority.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion6: 147–161. · DOI
- Juergensmeyer, Mark [2000] 2001Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Fundamentalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Kripal, Jeffrey 1995 Kālī’s Child: The Mystical and the Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- 1998 Kālī’s Child: The Mystical and the Erotic in the Life and Teachings of Ramakrishna. 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Kurson, Ken 2003 “Professor Denies Justifying 9/11 While Doing Exactly the Same.” Chicago Sun-Times, 15March: Editorial Letters, 13.
- Laine, James 2003 Shivaji: Hindu King in Islamic India. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Lincoln, Bruce 1989 Discourse and the Construction of Society: Comparative Studies of Myth, Ritual, and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
- 1996 “Theses on Method.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion8: 225–227. · DOI
- 2003 Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- McCutcheon, Russell T. 1997 Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 2001 Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- 2003 The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric. London: Routledge.
- 2004 “A Few Words on the Temptation to Defend the Honor of a Text.” Bulletin of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion33/3&4: 90–91.
- 2005 “Affinities, Benefits, and Costs: The ABCs of Good Scholars Gone Public.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion17/1: 27–43. · DOI
- 2006 “Relating Smith: Review Essay of Jonathan Z. Smith’s Relating Religion.” The Journal of Religion86/2 (April 2006): 287–297. · DOI
- O’Flaherty, Wendy Doniger 1986 “The Uses and Misuses of Other People’s Myths.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion54: 219–239. · DOI
- Orsi, Robert A. 1988 The Madonna of 115th Street: Faith and Community in Italian Harlem, 1880–1950. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- 2002 The Madonna of 115th Street: Faith and Community in Italian Harlem, 1880–1950. 2nd edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- 2004 “Fair Game.” Bulletin of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion33/3&4: 87–89.
- 2005 Between Heaven and Earth: The Religious Worlds People Make and the Scholars Who Study Them. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Padoux, André 1987 “Hindu Tantrism.” The Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 14: 274–280. Ed. by Mircea Eliade. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
- 1987 “Tantrism: An Overview.” The Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 14: 272–274. Ed. by Mircea Eliade. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
- Proudfoot, Wayne 1985 Religious Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Smith, Jonathan Z. 1982 Imagining Religion: from Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
- 1997 “Are Theological and Religious Studies Compatible?” Bulletin of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion26/3: 60–61.
- Smith, Wilfred Cantwell 1959 “The Comparative Study of Religion: Whither—and Why?” The History of Religions: Essays in Methodology, 31–58. Ed. by Mircea Eliade and Joseph Kitagawa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Urban, Hugh B. 2001 The Economics of Ecstacy: Tantra, Secrecy, and Power in Colonial Bengal. New York: Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 2001 Songs of Ecstacy: Tantric and Devotional Songs from Colonial Bengal. New York: Oxford University Press.
- 2003 Tantra: Sex, Secrecy, Politics and Power in the Study of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- White, David G. 2003 Kiss of the Yogi: “Tantric Sex” and its South Asian Contexts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moving monks and mountains: Chōgen and the cults of Gyōki, Mañjuśrī, and Wutai
Quinter, D. (2019) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2019.1689764 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- McCutcheon, R. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCutcheon, Russell T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Religion
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-30
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 720-750
- ISSN
- 0002-7189 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4585
- OpenAlex
- W2163994421
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 13.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Religion (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Theological Perspectives and Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
- Keywords
- representation of the other, religious differences, methodological pluralism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review